Ban was based on Centre’s studies: SC

Bench says it is not assuming executive or legislative powers through this action

April 05, 2017 12:03 am | Updated 12:03 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Centre may be placed in an unenviable position if States, Union Territories and liquor associations approach it for relief against the Supreme Court’s ban on liquor vends along National and State Highways.

For one, the Supreme Court has put it on record that the “basis and foundation” for the ban was derived entirely from studies done by the Central government over the past decade.

Secondly, a Bench of Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar and Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and L. Nageswara Rao went a step ahead to record that the Centre had pledged its “unequivocal” support to such a ban.

Justice Chandrachud, who wrote both the December 15, 2016 judgment and the March 31, 2017 order, made it clear that the Supreme Court was not assuming executive or legislative powers by declaring the ban, instead, it was merely following the Centre’s decade-old wish to remove liquor vends from highways.

“We must at the outset notice that this court, while exercising its jurisdiction, has neither formulated policy nor (as we shall indicate) has it assumed a legislative function,” Justice Chandrachud observed in the March 31 order. The order said the ban was based on material ranging from the policy of the Union Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH); the decision of the National Road Safety Council (NRSC), an apex body for road safety; Centre’s advisories to States for over a decade; and the Parliamentary mandate of zero tolerance for drunken driving.

Official data

The Bench said it banked on official data produced by the MoRTH to show the extent of road accidents caused by drunken driving.

“The judgment of this court adverted to the decision taken in a meeting held 13 years ago by the NRSC to the effect that licences for liquor shops should not be given along the National Highways,” Justice Chandrachud observed. The court said the decision to ban liquor vends came after extensive study of MoRTH advisories to States and Union Territories dating back to 2007.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.