The move seeks to negate the self-regulatory mechanism: NBA
Both news channels and print newspapers have united to oppose the Press Council of India’s move to bring the electronic media under its control.
On Thursday, the News Broadcasters Association (NBA) said it was extremely disappointed by the resolution “unilaterally,” released by PCI chairman Markandey Katju, and “purportedly passed” by the Council on August 27, which urged the government to amend the law and include broadcast and social media within its ambit.
“The NBA strongly opposes this move which seeks to negate the self-regulatory mechanism that has been in force for the last several years and has had a very real and positive impact in improving broadcasting standards,” said a statement issued by NBA secretary-general Annie Joseph said. It urged Justice Katju to “engage himself constructively with print media matters, which is the mandate he has under the Press Council Act and not to exceed his remit on commenting upon areas which are outside his jurisdiction.”
Supreme Court’s censure
In fact, NBA president K.V.L. Narayan Rao — who is also executive vice chairperson of NDTV — says that news broadcasters are more worried about the Supreme Court’s recent rebuke regarding news channels’ coverage of the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai. In its concluding remarks in the Kasab judgement, the apex court had said that “the mainstream electronic media has done much harm to the argument that any regulatory mechanism…must come only from within.”
“There is a difference between the Press Council saying something like this and the Supreme Court saying that, in their view, the self-regulation mechanism is not good enough,” Mr. Rao told The Hindu.
He felt that the News Broadcasting Standards Authority, set up in October 2008 under the chairmanship of former Chief Justice of India J.S. Verma, had “done far more to improve the standard of television news than the Press Council had done for the print medium.”
The Indian Newspaper Society (INS) has also joined in to oppose the PCI move to “bestow on itself more powers under the guise of bringing the electronic media” within its purview.
In a statement on Thursday, INS president Ashish Bagga said: “Print and electronic media in any case are based on two different formats altogether, clearly requiring two distinctively separate sets of guidelines…INS believes that the press in India is time-tested and self-regulated with enough maturity to continue to play the crucial role of the Fourth Estate of our vibrant democracy responsibly.”
Keywords: News Broadcasters Association, TV industry, print media industry, Press Council of India, Markandey Katju







PCI has clearly purported for a statutory body in the line of election
commission to bring the Electronic media under its ambit.It has never
recommended to bring under the purview of PCI.So,statements of INS and
NBA are entirely baseless.
Amending the PCI act to cover electronic media may not be a good move
but the rationale behind this move has got a locus standi. It is also
a need of the hour requirement. The purpose of national security and
harmony among society can not be assured by any kind of self
regulations for the fact that the NBA is a body of interested
people/organisations. While print media and cinema industry are
covered by statutory watch dog bodies like PCI and censor board, the
visual, air and social media are allowed to enjoy a long rope. Hence
these electronic media should be brought under a new statutory watch
dog body like Electronic media Council at least, if not under the PCI.
The NBA and INS should jointly fight the move of PCI to quietly take away the benefits to the society through RTI . Before doing so, the NBA and INS should evolve a stronger code of conduct and ethics - as an effective self regulatory mechanism - and can have an in house compliance set up to check the manner and standards of dissemination of information , with due adherence to the spirit of the remarks made by the Supreme Court on the coverage of 26/11 carnage by Kasab &Co, in the 24x7 news channels.
I feel the term 'self-regulatory' is little funny. Who will be doing this self regularization, channels who are competing each other to increase there TRP rating without any moral or social commitments?or channels flashing aishwarya rai's pregnancy as breaking news? They are 100% profit minded and they cannot do any self regularization.
I am completely supporting PCI chairman's move to bring electronic media under its control.
Please Email the Editor