Today's Paper Archives Subscriptions RSS Feeds Site Map ePaper Mobile Social
SEARCH

News » National

Wikipedia does not take sides: Jimmy Wales

Staff Reporter
Share  ·   Comment (1)   ·   print   ·  
Jimmy Wales
Jimmy Wales

BJP protests over “wrong” Indian map at Wiki conference

Wikipedia does not take a stand on controversial issues, but presents both sides to educate people. “We must study what the opponents believe too,” Jimmy Wales, founder of the free online encyclopaedia, said on Friday. He was speaking on the opening day of the three-day Wiki conference being held in the city.

Mr. Wales' remarks came in the context of a brief demonstration staged by the BJP youth wing outside the venue. A group of supporters raised slogans that Kashmir was an integral part of India. Ameet Satam, Mumbai president, Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha toldThe Hinduon the phone, “In the [Wikipedia] map of India, Jammu and Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh were shown in a different colour. This signifies that they are not a part of India. That map has been there for a long time. Earlier, objections were raised, but the head of the India chapter said it had no control over the content in Wikipedia. So we protested today.”The protest took place at 10 a.m. after Mr. Wales had left the venue. Mr. Satam said around 35 protesters were arrested and later released on a bond.

Arguing for a “neutral” approach, Mr. Wales said, “If Wikipedia has a one-sided map that is a mistake.”

“We should be neutral. We are not here to push an agenda. Writing about the world in a neutral way is a fundamental right. It is important to understand our opponents.”

The purpose of his collaborative venture was to “educate people without taking sides”. “You have to explain controversies to people,” he said. In Germany, for instance, advocacy of the swastika is “illegal,” but an academic discussion on the Nazi symbol was not. “In India, there is no filtering on these kind of issues. It is important to understand the map debate before saying the Government of India map is correct,” he said.

He cautioned Wikipedians not to violate national laws, but at the same time maintained that unjust censorship laws needed to be changed. “Many countries have newer filtering regimes. “China filtered pages on Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo.”

Mr. Wales said the thrust of Wikipedia was on fostering the growth of content in other languages. Currently, English was the largest language in Wikipedia. With a view to encouraging local language speakers and communities to contribute to the portal's database, a Global Wikipedian of the Year award was in the offing.

To facilitate entries in smaller languages, Mr. Wales called for “simplification” of rules and procedures. “There are over three million entries in English. A large community needs a lot of rules. But we don't need to copy these for a small group.” Hindi contributors stabilised with 50 editors, he said.

Professor Krishna Kumar, working on Indian languages in the U.K., said the future of Wikipedia and Wikimedia was bright. “It has done in a decade what the Alexandria library could not do in 2,000 years. Wikipedia will do a service to India where language problems have multiplied.”

Visually impaired persons spoke about the use of software to access Wikipedia. “Every word you type in Wikipedia is a helping hand for the visually impaired,” said Sathyasheelan, a government school teacher from Kerala who has been experimenting with software.

Anirudh Kumar, a Delhi professor, said most visually impaired persons only read the content on the portal but did not contribute to it.

More In: National | News

It is not a BJP - Wikipedia issue. It is an issue brought up by Indian Wikipedians which was taken up by BJYM. There is no doubt that no one has control on content on Wikipedia. Wikipedia doesn't have an Editorial board. But as an Indian Wikipedian I understand that it is criminal to associate with such distorted maps. I condemn these
illegal distortions and dis-associate myself from them. As a Wikipedian I brought this issue up with the Wikipedia India chapter and the organising committee in August. They have refused to take a stand on this. This news-story is one sided as it doesn't carry the view of dissenting Wikipedians, it also allows Jimmy Wales to get away with the straw man argument that he is making.

from:  Yogesh Khandke
Posted on: Nov 20, 2011 at 09:55 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
The HIndu's in-depth coverage of agriculture
The HIndu's in-depth coverage of news and opinion on Aadhar and direct benefit transfers


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Shashi Kant Sharma sworn in as CAG

Shashi Kant Sharma was on Thursday sworn in as CAG by President Pranab Mukherjee in the Rashtrapati Bhavan here.The 61-year-old 1... »