Students with disabilities allowed extra time and assistance of another student: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a dyslexic's plea for permission to use a calculator at his Class XII public examination in mathematics conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education.

(Dyslexia is a disorder involving difficulty in learning to read or interpret words.)

A Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justices Deepak Verma and C.K. Prasad dismissed a special leave petition filed by Pranay Jain, through his father, against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The CJI told senior counsel J.L. Gupta, appearing for the petitioner, a resident of Panchkula in Haryana: “When the CBSE, an expert body, has considered and decided against the use of calculator in the examination, scheduled for next week, it is not possible for us to allow you to use a calculator. We are told that there are about 300 students with dyslexia. If we allow your prayer, we may have to grant similar relief to all other students.”

When counsel said unequals could not be treated on a par with equals, the CJI pointed out that students with disabilities “are allowed one hour extra time and they also have the assistance of another student to write the examination. If the CBSE takes a decision to allow you, we will have no problem, but we cannot grant any relief.”

The CJI did not accept the submission that the CBSE rule denying use of a calculator was violative of Article 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution.

When counsel said Jain could be allowed to use a calculator and the results of the examination might be withheld until after the matter was disposed of, Justice Verma said, “The student's career will be in stagnation if we accept your argument.”

Senior counsel for the CBSE pointed out that the High Court had permitted the student assisting the petitioner to do the calculation and the Board accepted the order.

He said 1,891 students with various forms of disabilities were taking Standard X examinations and 1,306 students, standard XII examinations, and if use of the calculator was allowed for one candidate, then all others would have to be similarly permitted.

In his appeal, Jain said: “Education has been recognised as a fundamental right under Articles 21 (right to life) and 21 A (right to education). While so, the CBSE's rejection of his request was illegal, unjust, unfair and arbitrary, being violative of Article 14.”