Arguments on framing of charges in 2G case begin

July 21, 2011 08:45 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 01:31 am IST - New Delhi

Arguments on the framing of charges in the 2G spectrum allocation case commenced on Thursday, with Special Public Prosecutor U.U. Lalit telling the special court that departure from the first-come-first-served policy was the “fulcrum of all the mischief” that followed.

“The first-come-first-served principle meant that whosoever applies first will get priority in spectrum allocation. This policy was sought to be disregarded, which according to the prosecution is the fulcrum of all the mischief that happened,” Mr. Lalit said.

The investigation that resulted in the first charge sheet looked at the change in respect of the cut-off dates, the violation of the first-come-first-served policy, the dual technology approvals and spectrum allocation, the eligibility of various companies that applied, and the cheating of the government exchequer through the non-revision of the entry fee for new operators.

Mr. Lalit said the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, the former Telecom Secretary, Siddhartha Behura, and Mr. Raja's former private secretary, R.K. Chandolia, through their various acts, ensured that Swan Telecom and Unitech Wireless benefitted from deviations from the established policies.

Reliance Telecom, by floating Swan Telecom, had violated the law that stipulated that no group can have substantial equity holdings in two companies within the same circle.

Meanwhile, Reliance ADA Group managing director Gautam Doshi was denied permission by the court to travel to Chennai to attend the annual general meeting of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited, in which he is a director, given the seriousness of the allegations against him and his bail applications dismissed in the past.

The court further said the cause of his attending the meeting was not a matter that could be considered an emergency, and his absence from it while in custody could not be considered a wilful default under the Companies Act, 1956, as made out by his counsel.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.