Naidu hails SC order on MPs, MLAs conviction

Parties should keep out criminals and those with corrupt backgrounds, says TDP president

July 12, 2013 01:01 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:21 pm IST - HYDERABAD:

M.S. Chakravarthi, former Mayor of Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation, who rejoined TDP, in the presence of party president N. Chandrababu Naidu in Hyderabad on Thursday.

M.S. Chakravarthi, former Mayor of Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation, who rejoined TDP, in the presence of party president N. Chandrababu Naidu in Hyderabad on Thursday.

Telugu Desam president N. Chandrababu Naidu on Thursday hailed the Supreme Court judgment on immediate disqualification of convicted MPs and MLAs as “historic” and wanted all political parties to keep out those with criminal and corrupt backgrounds.

Addressing a press conference, Mr. Naidu said it was unfortunate that the Supreme Court had to step in to declare a much- abused provision as unconstitutional.

In an ideal situation, the government of the day should have introduced such electoral reforms that would make it difficult for those facing criminal and corruption charges to contest elections.

He recalled how it was Supreme Court and other courts that ensured inquiries and action in a series of cases including 2G spectrum and Commonwealth Games scams, Coalgate, Jagan assets and Obulapuram Iron Ore Mines.

All these have happened in Congress rule, but the governments were reluctant to take action.

Mr. Naidu said the wealth created by economic reforms was not reaching the poor as selfish politicians were taking advantage of loopholes in the system and knocking away the benefits and using the money to win in elections.

“Money earned through quid pro quo deals and investment made through the hawala route was also being used to earn legitimacy through elections, some even while being in jail. This vicious cycle has to be broken and the Supreme Court order is a good augury that will pave the way for cleansing the system.”

To a question if he favoured age of retirement for politicians, he said there was a difference of opinion. There was a view that it was like private service and there cannot be an age of retirement, while in US, leaders were contesting even at the age of 75.

“At the same time, I agree that young blood should be given preference and there is no second opinion over it.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.