Court ‘no' to Raju plea for time to surrender

November 09, 2010 03:11 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 05:20 am IST - New Delhi

Satyam scam accused B. Ramalinga Raju at the Nampally Criminal Courts in Hyderabad on Monday . Photo by:G. Ramakrishna

Satyam scam accused B. Ramalinga Raju at the Nampally Criminal Courts in Hyderabad on Monday . Photo by:G. Ramakrishna

The Supreme Court has declined to entertain an application filed by B. Ramalinga Raju, founder of Satyam Computer Services, seeking four weeks' time to surrender before court following cancellation of his bail.

A Bench of Justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma on October 26 cancelled bail granted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court to Mr. Raju and 5 others — Rama Raju, Vadlamani Srinivas, G. Ramakrishna, D. Venkatapathy Raju and Ch. Srisailam — and directed them to surrender by November 10.

On Tuesday, Mr. Raju sought further time to surrender. Senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for him, said the case was based on documentary evidence running into 1,60,000 pages and Mr. Raju needed thorough assistance of counsel during the trial. When Justice Bhandari did not accept the request, counsel pleaded for grant of at least a week's time.

In his application, Mr. Raju said he had been discharged from hospital only recently and that it would take some more time to recover from his illness. The Bench had cancelled bail observing that the respondents-accused were involved in one of the greatest corporate scams of the commercial world. Also the corporate credibility of the nation suffered a serious setback.

The Bench said: “We are deliberately refraining from making a detailed observation regarding the conduct of the respondents-accused because the trial is still pending and we do not want the trial to be prejudiced in any manner.

“Ordinarily we would be slow in cancelling the bail already granted by the High Court, but in the extraordinary facts and circumstances of these cases, we are of the considered view that the impugned orders passed by the High Court granting bail to the respondents cannot be sustained in law.”

If they failed to surrender on or before November 10, “the appellants [CBI] shall take appropriate steps in accordance with law.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.