Bifurcation debate: Kiran wants House to follow UP, Bihar method

Chief Minister furnishes copies of the proceedings followed in UP and Bihar legislatures during the debate on bifurcation

December 21, 2013 01:53 am | Updated November 16, 2021 06:10 pm IST - HYDERABAD:

Chief Minister N. Kiran Kumar Reddy has landed Legislative Council Chairman A. Chakrapani and Assembly Speaker Nadendla Manohar in a piquant situation by furnishing copies of the proceedings followed in UP and Bihar legislatures during debate on bifurcation.

The proceedings of UP Legislative Assembly and Council and Bihar legislature, copies of which are available with The Hindu, clearly lays down the procedure followed during bifurcation of the two States. A resolution was tabled in the legislatures of the two States and more importantly, the members demanded voting during debate on various clauses and sought amendments. Mr. Reddy’s intention in sending the copies to the presiding officers is to make them take a close look and adhere to the same procedure here while taking up the debate on AP Reorganisation Bill-2013 with emphasis on voting on amendments and clauses.

'Several changes were sought by members in UP, Bihar'

As for procedure per se followed in the Uttar Pradesh Assembly during the debate on the Bill in April 2000, the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs tabled a resolution after which the views of the members were sought. Then when the Bill was debated later several amendments were suggested by the members and they were put to voting.

Interestingly, the debate in Uttar Pradesh legislature saw members seeking amendment on capital of Uttaranchal, demand for creation of Bundelkhand and Vananchal and strong opposition to inclusion of some districts in Uttaranchal State. In all 29 amendments were put to voting during the debate.

In Bihar too during the debate on its bifurcation, several amendments were put to voting and the two Houses rejected the Bihar Reorganisation Bill 1998. The Bihar legislature urged the President that in the larger interest of the country and the State, he should not recommend the presentation of the Bill to Parliament. The presiding officers in their observations hoped that the President would be kind enough to impress upon the Centre to fully respect the conclusion of the legislature.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.