An ‘astonishing’ order for Sahara

July 22, 2014 11:52 pm | Updated April 22, 2016 02:32 am IST - NEW DELHI:

A plea for reham (mercy) changed to an indignant expression of “astonishment” in the Sahara camp in open court, seconds after the Supreme Court denied bail to their jailed chief, Subrata Roy.

On July 4, Sahara had ended their arguments with an emotional plea for ‘reham’. Tuesday’s order left them stunned.

The drama started soon after Justice T.S. Thakur finished reading the order in court on Tuesday and asked Sahara counsel, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, if he had anything to say on behalf of his client. “I am astonished. I have not seen anything like this. This kind of order is not expected,” Mr. Dhavan said.

To this, a calm-countenanced Justice Thakur said Mr. Roy’s “astonishment” started some time back before another Bench, and it continues still.

“If we were sitting in appeal, we could have reduced your astonishment,” Justice Thakur reasoned.

But Mr. Dhavan persisted, saying, “No person can be put in jail like this.”

“Perhaps we do not come up to your expectation. This is a decision given in our wisdom,” Justice Thakur said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.