Amit Shah will obstruct probe, so cancel bail: CBI

Plea in Supreme Court says he conspired to destroy evidence

September 27, 2011 11:01 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 05:18 am IST - New Delhi:

The CBI on Tuesday asserted in the Supreme Court that bail granted by the Gujarat High Court to the former Minister of State for Home Amit Shah should be cancelled and the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case transferred outside the State.

The CBI on Tuesday asserted in the Supreme Court that bail granted by the Gujarat High Court to the former Minister of State for Home Amit Shah should be cancelled and the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case transferred outside the State.

The CBI on Tuesday asserted in the Supreme Court that bail granted by the Gujarat High Court to the former Minister of State for Home Amit Shah should be cancelled and the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case transferred outside the State.

Sohrabuddin Sheikh, an extortionist, was killed in the encounter on November 26, 2005.

Mr. Shah, who was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation on July 25, 2010 in this case, was granted bail on October 29 and released the same night. The next day the CBI moved the Supreme Court.

Beginning final arguments on its appeal before a Bench of Justices Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai, Additional Solicitor-General Vivek Tankha, appearing for the CBI, said investigation revealed that Mr. Shah had, in pursuance of a criminal conspiracy, given illegal instructions on the probe into the Sohrabuddin case.

An important witness, Mohammed Azam, was kidnapped on September 21, 2010 when Mr. Shah was in judicial custody and there was enough material to show that some police officers had conspired to destroy crucial evidence, Mr. Tankha said.

Moreover, he said, the statements of several witnesses would bear testimony to the fact that Mr. Shah was using his power and position to obstruct the investigation, which was guided by the Supreme Court. There was documentary evidence on record that senior IPS officer Geeta Johri, who was supervising the Sohrabuddin case, was under tremendous pressure to tamper with evidence and witnesses.

Jethmalani's protest

At one stage, senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for Mr. Shah, objected to Mr. Tankha's allegations that certain documents were forged. He demanded an apology from the ASG for making “irresponsible and false statements without verifying records.” However, Mr. Tankha stuck to his submissions.

Arguments will continue on Wednesday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.