News » National

Updated: February 14, 2012 11:07 IST

Activists shocked at gallantry award for Chhattisgarh cop

Aman Sethi
Comment (5)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
A file picture of Soni Sori being taken away from the Court. Photo: Special Arrangement.
The Hindu
A file picture of Soni Sori being taken away from the Court. Photo: Special Arrangement.

Gender and rights activists have protested against the Union government presenting a gallantry award to a Chhattisgarh cadre police officer who allegedly supervised the torture of Soni Sori, a school teacher accused of assisting the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

On Republic Day, the officer, Ankit Garg, was awarded the Police Medal for Gallantry for his role in an October 9, 2010 counterinsurgency operation, in which about 250 members of the State's Special Task Force and district police ambushed Maoist guerrillas in Mahasamund district. Six Maoists were killed and two civilians, including a deaf and mute manual labourer, died in controversial circumstances. The police maintained that the civilians were caught in the crossfire in the course of a fluid operation.

Mr. Garg was subsequently appointed Superintendent of Police of Dantewada when Ms. Sori was arrested in October 2011 and accused of acting as a Maoist courier.

In a series of letters submitted to the Supreme Court, Ms. Sori says Mr. Garg verbally abused her and directed police personnel to torture her. She alleged that Mr. Garg watched as junior police personnel stripped her naked, administered electric shocks and assaulted her. According to her lawyers, a medical examination found two stones in Ms. Soni's genital tract and another in her rectum.

“Is this, then, the gallant behaviour of our Dantewada police under the able guidance of SP Ankit Garg, which the government is now felicitating? Is this an award for ruthlessly torturing people? Does the government approve of these methods? Is this an accepted way of carrying out war against their own people in the name of anti-Naxal operations?” asks a press note circulated by Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression, a national network of women's and rights organisations.

Mr. Garg has, however, categorically denied the allegations. “I can only say that the accusation has been made in the Supreme Court and the court has taken a decision on the 25th [of January]. More than two months have passed [since these allegations were first made.],” said Mr. Garg, who has subsequently been recalled to the police headquarters in Raipur.

“The final hearing is yet to begin,” said Colin Gonsalves, Ms. Sori's lawyer, disputing Mr. Garg's assertion that the court had come to a decision.

Vishwa Ranjan, Director-General of Police (Home Guards), said: “The Police Medal for Gallantry is for a specific instance … it is not like the award for Meritorious Service … Ankit Garg led one of the teams in the Mahasamund [encounter].” He added the Soni Sori case was a separate issue that was now sub judice.

Barbaric savage. Law enforcement once again being rewarded for acting with no regard for human rights, nevermind humanity. I guess it doesnt matter where in the world you live, the savages are in charge of savility.

from:  noname
Posted on: Feb 14, 2012 at 04:33 IST

As a woman and as a journalist from Chhattisgarh, I can simply express my shock at the above instance. By giving this award, not only the state but even the Union government has upheld atrocities and abuse of human rights in an institutionalised way, thereby giving a go ahead to all those personnel and Police Officers who lack respect for women, for human rights aqnd also for the entire Human race.

from:  Surabhi Singh
Posted on: Jan 30, 2012 at 17:06 IST

Why award has been given to a controversial figure? It unnecessarily
hurts sentiments of people and also raise questions over the value of
highly prestigious awards. Operation also laid down the lives of two
innocent civilians, shouldn't the feelings attached to their's be taken
care of while awarding?

from:  Praveen verrma
Posted on: Jan 27, 2012 at 10:09 IST

Controversy in the selection of awardees are in effect an insult to the past and future recipients, and greatly demeans the award. As very many worthies fail to be officially recognised for great achievements, controversies in awardees belittle the unlucky ones who miss out. Urgency is also not a criterion. Seems that the selection of awardees is as much a mess as the handling of most matters of governance. This emotive and avoidable case also increases the doubts on the governments portrayal of the maoist menace.

from:  Arvind R.
Posted on: Jan 27, 2012 at 06:32 IST

The indian police is no saint neither the army jawan..from Kasmir, to north east tales of their utter disregard for women abound...

from:  jagjit
Posted on: Jan 27, 2012 at 00:26 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Other States






Recent Article in National

‘Affair does not mean yes to physical intimacy’

Observing that entering into a love affair cannot be presumed that the woman has given her consent for a physical relationship, a Delhi c... »