A lead the SIT ignored on Gujarat riots

Call records lend weight to Sanjiv Bhatt's claimed presence at meeting with Modi

November 12, 2011 02:01 am | Updated August 01, 2016 06:24 am IST - New Delhi:

Suspended Indian police officer Sanjeev Bhatt, center, is escorted after his arrest by police in Ahmadabad, India, Friday Sept. 30, 2011. Bhatt, who has accused Gujarat state Chief Minister Narendra Modi of complicity in post-Godhra riots, was arrested on Friday in connection with a complaint regarding coercion of a subordinate, according to news reports. The 2002 Godhra riots was one of India's worst outbursts of violence between Hindus and Muslims. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki)

Suspended Indian police officer Sanjeev Bhatt, center, is escorted after his arrest by police in Ahmadabad, India, Friday Sept. 30, 2011. Bhatt, who has accused Gujarat state Chief Minister Narendra Modi of complicity in post-Godhra riots, was arrested on Friday in connection with a complaint regarding coercion of a subordinate, according to news reports. The 2002 Godhra riots was one of India's worst outbursts of violence between Hindus and Muslims. (AP Photo/Ajit Solanki)

Telephone records accessed by The Hindu lend credence to a crucial affidavit filed by a journalist backing senior police officer Sanjiv Bhatt's claim to have attended the controversial 2002 meeting at Narendra Modi's residence where the Gujarat Chief Minister allegedly said Hindus should be allowed to vent their anger against Muslims in the wake of the Godhra carnage.

The records show Mr. Bhatt and the journalist, former BBC correspondent Shubhranshu Chaudhary, were at roughly the same location and talking to each other before the February 27, 2002 meeting between Mr. Modi and the State's top cops.

Mr. Bhatt has claimed — in depositions before the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team and in an affidavit — that he was present at the meeting and had heard the Gujarat Chief Minister instruct his officials to allow “revenge” attacks against Muslims. However, the SIT dismissed Mr. Bhatt as an unreliable witness and said none of the officials present at the meeting confirmed having seen him there. With Mr. Bhatt's presence itself in dispute, no credence could be attached to his account of what happened at the meeting, the SIT concluded.

The SIT, however, never examined Mr. Chaudhary, whose affidavit says Mr. Bhatt left an interview with him to go to Mr. Modi's residence that night.

Talking to The Hindu , Mr. Chaudhary recalled his own meeting with Mr. Bhatt at his home late in the evening on February 27, 2002. His version of events — portions of which are contained in an affidavit he has filed in the Supreme Court — is that he reached Ahmedabad that evening. He immediately fixed up to meet Mr. Bhatt, and after finding out the location of his house on phone, reached there around 9 p.m. At 9.30 p.m., Mr. Bhatt hurried out saying he had been summoned to attend a meeting at the Chief Minister's residence.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.