Not all quiet on the Kashmir front

Starting with Pathankot attack in January, the year witnessed heightened tensions along the border

December 28, 2016 12:18 am | Updated 01:24 am IST - NEW DELHI:

 Army jawans take position during encounter at Anantnag district south kashmir. Photo Nissar Ahmad

Army jawans take position during encounter at Anantnag district south kashmir. Photo Nissar Ahmad

The year 2016 has been one of the worst in recent times for the Army in terms of casualties in Jammu and Kashmir with major attacks on military installations and heightened tensions along the border with Pakistan.

It began on a bitter note with an attack on the Pathankot Air Force station in the early hours of January 2.

There were major attacks on Army bases in Uri and Nagrota in the latter part of the year, resulting in significant casualties on security forces. There was also a dramatic spike in cross-border firing after the Uri attack.

“This year all parameters — infiltration, ceasefire violations, terrorists killed and soldiers lost — have seen an increase over last year,” an Army source said.

The Army lost 63 personnel in Jammu & Kashmir, almost double that of last year. In 2015, it lost 33 personnel and in 2014, 32.

Rise in infiltration bids

With increase in infiltration attempts, the number of terrorists killed has also gone up. Over 140 terrorists were neutralised. There was also an upward trend in the number of suicide attacks compared with the last two years.

The general assessment is that 2016 was less productive for Pakistan and so there was a concerted effort to push in infiltrators and also keep the hinterland active, a senior officer observed.

Things took a dramatic turn particularly after the killing of Hizbul Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani in July which plunged the Kashmir Valley into a spiral of protests and violence.

The protests had severely affected the Army’s target-specific operations in the hinterland as intelligence gathering and movement were disrupted.

“With normalcy restored, the operations in the hinterland have resumed now as local police are cooperating again and intelligence is flowing,” the officer added.

Active border

India on its part has toughened its response to provocations from across the border. The ceasefire declared by India and Pakistan along the border in 2003 and which brought relative peace came under severe stress this year especially after the Uri terror attack which claimed the lives of 19 soldiers and the resultant ‘surgical strikes’ carried out by the Army along the Line of Control (LoC).

Both sides resorted to the use of 80mm and 120mm heavy mortars to target posts on the other side, in addition to small arms and machine guns.

Each side has also accused the other of employing heavy artillery, though neither side acknowledged having used it themselves.

The multiple attacks on military installations very close to the border have laid bare the gaps in perimeter security in high-threat areas.

After the conversation between the Directors General of Military Operations of India and Pakistan over the hotline in mid-November, the border has been largely quiet.

However security forces have reasons to be concerned about the situation in the hinterland.

Increase in militant ranks

The number of terrorists in the Valley is estimated to be between 200-300. Army sources said that after Burhan Wani’s killing there is a rise in radicalisation among the youth and more locals have joined militant ranks.

“After Burhan Wani, recruitment is on the rise. New breed of militants are coming to the fore,” a senior officer said.

Tackling them will be a challenge for the security forces in the New Year.

The repercussions of this could be felt once snow melts next year.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.