MPs demand probe into the way E. Ahamed’s death was “handled”

The 78-year-old Indian Union Muslim League leader died at RML hospital where he was admitted on January 31 and put on artificial life support.

February 03, 2017 04:24 pm | Updated 04:24 pm IST - New Delhi

Body of Indian Union Muslim League national president E. Ahamed, MP, in a funeral procession on Thursday.

Body of Indian Union Muslim League national president E. Ahamed, MP, in a funeral procession on Thursday.

A senior opposition member in Rajya Sabha on Friday sought a probe into the manner in which the death of former Union Minister E Ahamed was “handled,” alleging he had died soon after being rushed to the hospital but his demise was announced much later.

Raising the issue during the Zero Hour, Sitaram Yechury of the CPI(M) said there were varied allegations and various information that “I have got that some doctors say he was declared dead when he was taken to the hospital.”

Some say Ahamed died subsequently in the ICU, Mr. Yechury said, adding that later the IUML leader was shifted to the trauma centre as there were better facilities there.

“I want a proper and thorough investigation in the manner in which the death of one of our senior colleagues of Parliament and a former Cabinet Minister E Ahamed was handled and the way in which the news of his death was sought to be suppressed,” he said.

The 78-year-old Indian Union Muslim League leader died at RML hospital where he was admitted on January 31 and put on artificial life support.

“There has been interference, that’s what I hear, from the highest authorities in the country, from the PMO, and this is something which cannot be accepted. This is shameful...I want this issue to be thoroughly investigated. I wish my information is not correct, what I heard. But if it is correct, then they must be made acountable and action must be taken against those who have behaved in this manner,” Mr. Yechury said.

He further said that other senior leaders were not allowed to see Ahamed in the hosptial and even his own children were not allowed to see him initially.

The CPI(M) leader also argued that a person cannot be put on life support without the permission of the nearest relative and wanted to know “how and why was the announcement of his death delayed.”

In the Lok Sabha when some Opposition members, particularly those from Kerala, raised the matter around 1 p.m., there was a heated exchange between TMC MP Saugata Roy and some BJP members, forcing Speaker Sumitra Mahajan to adjourn the House for the day.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.