Lack of consensus in UN for ban, says Beijing

December 31, 2016 12:40 am | Updated 12:40 am IST - BEIJING:

China on Friday cited the absence of consensus among members of a U.N. committee to explain its decision to block a ban, sought by India, on Masood Azhar, the head of the Pakistan based group, Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM).

In response to a question from The Hindu , the Foreign Ministry spokesperson’s office cited U.N. Security Council 1267 Committee, which was approached by India for a ban on the JeM chief as an “important anti-terrorism” organisation.

‘Different opinions’

It added: “The Chinese side always believes that 1267 Committee upholds the objective, just and professional principles with regard to the list and makes decisions based on consensus reached by Security Council members.”

The statement pointed out that “members of 1267 committee have different opinions”. It stressed that China used to propose a “technical hold” in order to leave more time for the Committee to deliberate and related parties to further negotiate. “Unfortunately, no consensus has been reached so far.”

It said, “The actions China took in the committee aimed to maintain the authority and effectiveness of the Committee’s list and are in accord with Security Council resolution and Committee’s rules of procedure.”

The Foreign Ministry highlighted that “China will maintain communication with all related sides according to Security Council resolution and Committee’s rules of procedure.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.