Cash for land is just not done: SC

Apex court agrees to hear plight of farmers displaced by the Sardar Sarovar Project

January 10, 2017 11:16 pm | Updated 11:16 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

To the rescue:  The court had earlier dismissed applications by the M.P. government and the Narmada Valley Development Authority to modify the apex court judgments upholding land rights for sons of affected farmers. —  File Photo

To the rescue: The court had earlier dismissed applications by the M.P. government and the Narmada Valley Development Authority to modify the apex court judgments upholding land rights for sons of affected farmers. — File Photo

Agreeing to hear the plight of the landless victims of the Sardar Sarovar Project in detail, the Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that giving cash instead of land to farmers who lost their fertile lands to the mega dam project is “tentatively” not acceptable.

“We will tell you now itself. You giving cash instead of land is tentatively not acceptable. That’s just not done,” Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar, who headed a three-judge Bench, told the Narmada authorities and counsel for Madhya Pradesh.

Appearing for the Narmada Bachao Andolan, advocate Sanjay Parikh asked why poor people whose lands have been taken away from them should continue to suffer. “It is land for land,” Mr. Parikh said.

“They have worked their lands all their lives,” Chief Justice Khehar said during the hearing.

Mr. Parikh said the farmers are left with neither land nor livelihood despite there being binding orders from the Supreme Court upholding their right to land.

Hearing adjourned

Chief Justice Khehar, who wanted to hear the petitions on Tuesday, agreed to adjourn the hearing to January 19 for a detailed hearing after the government authorities sought time for preparation.

Earlier, the apex court had dismissed an application by the Madhya Pradesh government and the Narmada Valley Development Authority for a modification of the apex court judgments of 2000 and 2005 upholding land rights for adult sons of the Sardar Sarovar Project-affected farmers.

The apex court’s Social Justice Bench led by Justice Madan B. Lokur had said the State’s application suffered from gross delay, after having been filed several years since the Supreme Court gave its verdict on the issue.

Mr. Parikh had submitted that as per the Narmada Tribunal Award and the Supreme Court verdicts, all adult sons were indisputably entitled to five acres of cultivable and irrigable land, and any discrimination would lead to the violation of the constitutional rights of the oustees.

Terming the application as “not to be good governance,” the Bench had dismissed it.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.