‘CBI chief meeting 2G accused improper’

Whistleblower acted in public interest and not for publicity, says Special Public Prosecutor

October 16, 2014 04:41 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:10 pm IST - New Delhi

CBI director Ranjit Sinha. File photo

CBI director Ranjit Sinha. File photo

Objecting to the Supreme Court order on revealing the identity of the whistleblower who leaked the visitors’ register at CBI Director Ranjit Sinha’s residence, Special Public Prosecutor in 2G cases, Anand Grover, said the frequent meetings between Mr. Sinha and the accused during the probe and prosecution of the sensitive case, were “definitely improper.”

Mr. Grover said the whistleblower acted in public interest and not for publicity. “The whistleblower’s right to physical safety emerging from his right to life under Article 21 can only be protected by non-disclosure."

‘Whistleblower’s right to life in danger’

Mr. Grover, objecting to the Supreme Court’s directive to advocate Prashant Bhushan to reveal the name of the whistleblower who passed on the guest list maintained at the CBI chief’s residence, said, “The whistleblower’s right to security of his life and physical safety emerging from his right to life under Article 21 can only be protected by non-disclosure of his name.”

The Supreme Court had on September 15 asked advocate Prashant Bhushan to confidentially reveal the name of the source who passed on the guest list maintained at the CBI chief’s residence.

But Mr. Bhushan refused to divulge the name, saying exposure would endanger the source’s life and lead to a breach of trust. In a later hearing on September 22, the court had considered recalling its September 15 order. It had then sought the assistance of Mr. Grover to explain how entertaining allegations against the CBI chief would affect pending and future criminal cases in the scam.

The whistleblower proved his bona fides when, instead of taking any personal credit, he preferred to remain anonymous and approached Mr. Bhushan, the lawyer fighting the 2G case in the Supreme Court, with the information and documents.

He said the court should not insist on disclosure of his identity merely for the sake of disclosure.

He said the information leaked did not concern the personal affairs of the CBI Director. The register was a record of the official meetings held by Mr. Sinha at the camp office in his residence, and so his conduct came under public gaze. Mr. Sinha had no right to argue that the leak was a violation of his right to privacy, he said.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.