1984 riots: Court to consider closure report on April 22

The court had earlier issued notice on the closure report to the complainant and victim, Lakhvinder Kaur, for Friday, but her advocate claimed that she hasn’t yet been served the notice.

March 27, 2015 11:51 am | Updated November 16, 2021 08:20 pm IST - New Delhi

Members of the Sikh community stage a protest demonstration against the closure report filed by the CBI against former Union Minister Jagdish Tytler in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case outside CBI Headquarters, in New Delhi Thursday. Photo: V. Sudershan

Members of the Sikh community stage a protest demonstration against the closure report filed by the CBI against former Union Minister Jagdish Tytler in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case outside CBI Headquarters, in New Delhi Thursday. Photo: V. Sudershan

A Delhi court today fixed April 22 for hearing CBI’s closure report in a case against Congress leader Jagdish Tytler in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

The hearing could not take place today as Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) Saurabh Pratap Singh Laler was not holding court. The magistrate is in Lucknow from March 20-28 for training purpose.

The court had earlier issued notice on the closure report to the complainant and victim, Lakhvinder Kaur, whose husband Badal Singh was killed during the riots, for Friday. Advocate Kamna Vohra, appearing for Kaur, however, claimed that the victim has not yet been served the notice.

The court had earlier said “perusal of records revealed that the cancellation report was also filed earlier as regards accused Jagdish Tytler.” This was the third time that Mr. Tytler was given a clean chit in the case by the investigating agency.

CBI had said it has conducted further probe in the case, as directed by a sessions court, and filed a closure report in the matter. In April 2013, CBI was directed by a sessions court to further investigate the case as it set aside its earlier closure report.

Expressing displeasure over the CBI’s move of filing the closure report, senior advocate H.S. Phoolka, representing the riot victims, had said, “Why is it being done so secretly? Even the complainant has not been informed about it. It has been filed secretly. This shows an attempt has been made to get the closure report accepted by the court in hush-hush manner.”

He had said the closure report was filed on December 24, 2014 and he had come to know about it only now and that too, unofficially, through another lawyer, while the victim has not been informed till then. The sessions court on April 10, 2013 had set aside CBI’s closure report giving clean chit to Mr. Tytler and ordered reopening of investigation into the killing of three persons.

CBI had earlier opposed the plea for further probe. The court had found fault in the investigation by the agency which had not examined the available witnesses. The court’s 2013 order had come on a plea by the riot victims against the CBI giving a clean chit to Mr. Tytler and filing a closure report.

The victims had sought the court’s direction to the CBI to further probe the case to ascertain Mr. Tytler’s alleged role in the riots. The CBI had, however, sought dismissal of the victim’s plea saying the probe has made it clear that Mr. Tytler was not present on November 1, 1984 at Gurudwara Pulbangash in North Delhi where three people were killed during the riots, but was rather at Teen Murti Bhavan, where former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s body was lying in state.

Mr. Tytler’s alleged role in the case relating to the killing of three persons — Badal Singh, Thakur Singh and Gurcharan Singh — near Gurudwara Pulbangash was re-investigated by the CBI after a court had in December 2007 refused to accept its closure report. Another accused Suresh Kumar Paniwala, who faced trial for the offences of murder and inciting the mob during the riots, was acquitted by a Delhi court in 2014.

CBI had again given a clean chit to Mr. Tytler on April 2, 2009 claiming lack of evidence against him in the case pertaining to the murder of three persons on November 1, 1984, in the aftermath of the assassination of Indira Gandhi.

However, on April 27, 2010, a magistrate had accepted CBI’s closure report in the case against Mr. Tytler, saying there was no evidence to put him on trial. Some of the witnesses had alleged that during the riots, Mr. Tytler was instigating the mob to kill Sikhs, a charge strongly refuted by him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.