Military assistance to Pak not a threat to India: U.S.

July 28, 2010 09:14 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:15 pm IST - Washington

Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, right, and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrive at the foreign ministry ahead of their meeting in Islamabad, Pakistan, Monday, July 19, 2010. Clinton sought Monday to convince skeptical Pakistanis that American interest in their country extends beyond the fight against Islamist militants by announcing a raft of new aid projects worth $500 million. (AP Photo/Adrees Latif, Pool)

Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, right, and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrive at the foreign ministry ahead of their meeting in Islamabad, Pakistan, Monday, July 19, 2010. Clinton sought Monday to convince skeptical Pakistanis that American interest in their country extends beyond the fight against Islamist militants by announcing a raft of new aid projects worth $500 million. (AP Photo/Adrees Latif, Pool)

Strongly recommending the case of continued peace talks between India and Pakistan, the Obama Administration has said that a stable Indo-Pak relationship would benefit the world and the U.S. in particular and reiterated that Islamabad should address New Delhi’s concern with regard to 26/11.

“It is important for Pakistan and India to have a stable relationship. They, likewise, will have to have a relationship going forward, and if it is stable, then the world, including the U.S., benefits,” State Department spokesman, P. J. Crowley, told reporters at his daily news briefing.

“So we are very, very conscious of the complexity that involves these overlapping relationships, and we’ve worked hard in our dialogue with each country to try to make this a more regional approach to a common challenge,” he said noting there is communication going on across these countries that it thinks is very important, very valuable not just to the U.S., but also it is important for Afghanistan and Pakistan to have a stable relationship.

“We have important national and global interests with each of these countries. Our support for Afghanistan is not taken from Pakistan. Our support for Pakistan does not mean a negative for India,” he said.

“It is vitally important that these countries develop reinforcing relationships; that’s what we’re trying to do.

That’s why one of the fundamental changes in the strategy that the President approved last year was to make sure that we are looking at this in a regional rather than just an isolated issue.

So part of the solution to Afghanistan does, in fact, fall within the borders of Pakistan,” he said.

Mr. Crowley argued that a stable Pakistan is not a threat to India and a stable India does not need to be a threat to Pakistan.

“In giving military assistance to Pakistan, we have systems of accountability to be sure that it is being employed in accordance with the agreements that we have with Pakistan,” he said.

“Where we have questions about the nature of Pakistani employment of U.S. assistance, we raise those questions directly with the Pakistani Government. We have in the past and we will continue to do that,” he said.

“So building up the capability of Pakistan to deal with the threat within its own borders should not be seen as a threat to India,” Mr. Crowley said.

Responding to a question, Mr. Crowley said there are concerns about making sure that Pakistan bring to justice those responsible for the Mumbai attack.

“We’ve had that conversation with Pakistan and India many, many times. Our concerns about elements within Pakistan and connections that those elements have with the Pakistani Government, we’ve had that conversation with Pakistan many times,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.