Would respond if India attacks: Zardari told U.S. after 26/11

December 01, 2010 11:21 am | Updated November 17, 2021 05:28 am IST - Washington

In the tense post 26/11 scenario, Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari had told the U.S. that Islamabad would have no option but to respond militarily if India chose to launch an attack on its territory, secret US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.

In a meeting with the then U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson on January 2, Mr. Zardari had however assured that his government would not allow non-state actors to dictate state policy.

Ms. Patterson had called on Mr. Zardari to discuss the follow-up to the Mumbai investigation, and Mr. Zardari told her that there was no way that he could let India attack Pakistan.

“There was no more politically sensitive issue in Pakistan than Kashmir,” Mr. Zardari said according to the cable.

“Zardari said he had been briefed by Lt General Shuja Pasha (the ISI chief) on his meeting with DCIA (Director of the Central Intelligence Agency), and he had approved the release of ‘tearline’ information to the Indians.

He wanted to emphasise he (and General Kayani) were fully committed to better relations with India, the cable said.

“He (Zardari) reminded the Ambassador that it had only taken a ‘phone call’ from the US to ensure that Pakistan did not oppose the U.S./India civil nuclear deal at the Nuclear Suppliers Group,” it said.

“Zardari emphasised he had no problem making decisions, recalling that we had asked him to refuse the release of detainees in the context of ‘peace deals’ when the Army and ISI were pressing to do so,” the cable said.

“But he said there was no way that he could let India attack Pakistan: many in the West did not understand the importance of Kashmir in Pakistani public opinion,” says the leaked US cable dated January 5, 2009 and signed off by Patterson.

Mr. Zardari confirmed again at the end of the conversation that Pakistan would not allow non-state actors to dictate state policy, but that the GOP (Government of Pakistan) would respond if the Indians attacked.

He also recommended a report done in India which indicated that Indian Muslims were treated poorly and were among the least prosperous members of society, the cable said.

“He said that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was trying to whip up anti-Muslim sentiment. Moreover, there were plenty of extremist groups in India that could have assisted LeT,” it said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.