U.S. President Barack Obama defended top secret National Security Agency spying programmes as legal in a lengthy interview and called them transparent even though they are authorized in secret.

“It is transparent,” Mr. Obama told PBS’s Charlie Rose in an interview to be broadcast late Monday. “That’s why we set up the FISA court,” he added, referring to the secret court set up by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that authorizes two recently leaked programmes — one that gathers U.S. phone records and another that is designed to track the use of U.S.-based Internet servers by foreigners with possible links to terrorism.

The location of FISA courts is secret. The sessions are closed. The orders that result from hearings in which only government lawyers are present are classified.

“We’re going to have to find ways where the public has an assurance that there are checks and balances in place... that their phone calls aren’t being listened into; their text messages aren’t being monitored, their emails are not being read by some big brother somewhere,” Mr. Obama said.

Mr. Obama was in Northern Ireland for a meeting of leaders of allied countries. As he arrived, the latest series of Guardian articles drawing on the leaks claimed that British eavesdropping agency GCHQ repeatedly hacked into foreign diplomats’ phones and emails with U.S. help, in an effort to get an edge in such high-stakes negotiations.

Mr. Obama’s announcement followed an online chat on Monday by Edward Snowden, the former NSA systems analyst contractor who leaked documents revealing the scope of the two programmes to The Guardian and The Washington Post newspapers. He accused members of Congress and administration officials of exaggerating their claims about the success of the data gathering programs, including pointing to the arrest of would-be New York subway bomber Najibullah Zazi in 2009.

Mr. Snowden said Zazi could have been caught with narrower, targeted surveillance programmes a point Mr. Obama conceded in his interview without mentioning Mr. Snowden.

“We might have caught him some other way,” Mr. Obama said. “We might have disrupted it because a New York cop saw he was suspicious. Maybe he turned out to be incompetent and the bomb didn’t go off. But at the margins we are increasing our chances of preventing a catastrophe like that through these programmes.”

Mr. Obama also told Mr. Rose he wanted to encourage a national debate on the balance between privacy and national security a topic renewed by Mr. Snowden’s disclosures.

Mr. Obama repeated earlier assertions that the programs were a legitimate counter-terror tool and that they were completely non-invasive to people with no terror ties. He also said he has created a privacy and civil liberties oversight board.

“I’ll be meeting with them. And what I want to do is to set up and structure a national conversation, not only about these two programs, but also the general problem of data, big data sets, because this is not going to be restricted to government entities,” he said.

Congressional leaders have said Mr. Snowden’s disclosures have led terrorists to change their behaviour, which may make them harder to stop a charge Mr. Snowden discounted as an effort to silence him.

“The U.S. government is not going to be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me,” he said. He added the government “immediately and predictably destroyed any possibility of a fair trial at home” by labelling him a traitor, and he indicated he would not return to the U.S. voluntarily.

The Guardian announced that its website was hosting an online chat with Mr. Snowden, in hiding in Hong Kong, with reporter Glenn Greenwald receiving and posting his questions. The Associated Press couldn’t independently verify that Mr. Snowden was the man who posted replies to questions.

In answer to the question of whether he fled to Hong Kong because he was spying for China, Mr. Snowden wrote, “Ask yourself - if I were a Chinese spy, why wouldn’t I have flown directly into Beijing? I could be living in a palace petting a phoenix by now.”

Congressional leaders have accused Snowden of treason for revealing once-secret surveillance programmes two weeks ago. The NSA programmes collect records of millions of Americans’ telephone calls and Internet usage as a counter-terror tool. The disclosures revealed the scope of the collections, which surprised many Americans.

Mr. Snowden dismissed being called a traitor by former Vice President Dick Cheney, who served under President George W. Bush and made the allegations in an interview on Fox News on Sunday. Mr. Cheney was echoing the comments of both Democrats and Republican leadership in Congress.

“Being called a traitor by Dick Cheney is the highest honour you can give an American, and the more panicked talk we hear from people like him... the better off we all are,” Mr. Snowden said.

Mr. Snowden defended his actions and said he considered what to reveal and what not to reveal. He said he did not reveal any U.S. operations against what he called legitimate military targets but instead showed that the NSA is hacking civilian infrastructure like universities and private businesses.

“These nakedly, aggressively criminal acts are wrong no matter the target. Not only that, when NSA makes a technical mistake during an exploitation operation, critical systems crash,” he said, though he gave no examples.

“Congress hasn’t declared war on the countries the majority of them are our allies but without asking for public permission, NSA is running network operations against them that affect millions of innocent people,” he said. “And for what? So we can have secret access to a computer in a country we’re not even fighting?”

Mr. Snowden was referring to Prism, one of the programmes he disclosed. The programme sweeps up Internet usage data from all over the world that goes through nine major U.S.-based Internet providers. The NSA can look at foreign usage without any warrants and says the program doesn’t target Americans.

Mr. Snowden explained his claim that from his desk, he could “wiretap” any phone call or email a claim top intelligence officials have denied. “If an NSA, FBI, CIA, DIA, etc. analyst has access to query raw SIGINT (signals intelligence) databases, they can enter and get results for anything they want,” he wrote in the answer posted on the Guardian site. “Phone number, email, user id, cell phone handset id (IMEI), and so on it’s all the same.”

The NSA did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has said that the kind of data that can be accessed and who can access it is severely limited.

More In: World | International | News