Incumbent Kenyan PM alleges rigging, demands recount

March 07, 2013 06:00 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:33 am IST - ADDIS ABABA:

Prime Minister Raila Odinga’s supporters said the ballot count in Kenya’s general elections had been rigged and called for counting to be started from scratch.

“We as a coalition take the position the national vote-tallying process lacks integrity and has to be stopped and re-started using primary documents from the polling stations,” said Mr. Odinga’s running mate, Kalonzo Musyoka, at a press conference in Nairobi, even as he called on Kenyans to remain calm.

Mr. Musyoka’s comments are significant against the backdrop of the 2007 elections when more than 1,200 people were killed in pitched post-election battles after candidates questioned the integrity of the result.

With approximately half the votes counted, Mr. Odinga had about two million votes against the 2.7 million garnered by his main rival, Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta. Mr. Kenyatta has been indicted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in the 2007 violence, but has denied the charges.

‘Rejected’ ballots

As per the constitution, brought in after the 2007 violence, the winning candidate must get at least 50 per cent of the national vote and 25 per cent of the vote in each county to avoid a second round run-off.

Mr. Kenyatta currently has more than 50 per cent of the votes counted thus far, but a large number of “spoiled” and “rejected” ballot papers could complicate an already tense situation.

Voting peaceful

After a largely peaceful day of voting on March 4, the country’s electronic tallying system crashed, prompting a manual recount of votes and allegations of vote tampering.

Further, more than 300,000 votes were rejected in the first count, but subsequently the number of rejected ballots was reduced to only 40,000.

Candidates have differed over how to incorporate the rejected ballots, with Mr. Odinga’s supporters calling for the rejected ballots to be incorporated into the main pool that would dilute the vote-shares of all candidates and make a run-off more likely.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.