China’s air defence zone unnecessarily inflammatory: US

November 27, 2013 10:33 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 10:30 pm IST - Washington

In this Sept. 2012 photo, the tiny islands in the East China Sea, called Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyu in Chinese are seen.  The Chinese Defense Ministry on Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013, issued a map of an East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone that includes a chain of disputed islands also claimed by Japan, triggering a protest from Tokyo. (AP Photo/Kyodo News) JAPAN OUT, MANDATORY CREDIT

In this Sept. 2012 photo, the tiny islands in the East China Sea, called Senkaku in Japanese and Diaoyu in Chinese are seen. The Chinese Defense Ministry on Saturday, Nov. 23, 2013, issued a map of an East China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone that includes a chain of disputed islands also claimed by Japan, triggering a protest from Tokyo. (AP Photo/Kyodo News) JAPAN OUT, MANDATORY CREDIT

American officials came down hard on Beijing’s November 23, 2013 demarcation of an Air Defence Identification Zone that includes territory it disputes with Japan, even as they defended the flight of two American B-52 bombers through the zone as being “part of a long-planned training sortie”.

Speaking to media, White House spokesperson Josh Earnest said the announcement of the ADIZ, which includes the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, was “unnecessarily inflammatory and has a destabilising impact on the region.” He added that such differences should not be addressed with “threats” but rather could and should be resolved diplomatically.

Earlier, Pentagon spokesman Tom Crosson said the warplanes were not intercepted or otherwise challenged but neither did the U.S. pilots announce themselves during the flight, which was said to have lasted two hours and 20 minutes.

Meanwhile, the State Department was quick to confirm that there was no change in its long-standing policy on the Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute.

To a question whether Washington had allowed itself to get dragged into the dispute regarding the islands, spokesperson Jen Psaki said: “I don’t think that there’s been any bait taken. … When there are concerns that need to be expressed, we are not shy about expressing them… We don’t take a position on the question of sovereignty. That hasn’t changed.”

However, Ms. Psaki also hit out at China’s “attempt to unilaterally change the status quo in the East China Sea,” which would “raise regional tensions and increase the risk of miscalculation, confrontation, and accidents.”

The department confirmed that multiple efforts were under way to reach out to Beijing diplomatically to voice this concern, including conversations between Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel and the Chinese Ambassador here, and between U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke and his Chinese interlocutors.

Additionally, the Department noted in a read-out on Wednesday, Washington was concurrently consulting “Japan and other affected parties throughout the region in response to this announcement,” and in a call with Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reiterated his own and Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel’s expressions of “concern” about China’s ADIZ designation.

On Wednesday, Mr. Hagel in a call with Japanese Defence Minister Itsunori Onodera was said to have “commended the Japanese government for exercising appropriate restraint,” and assured him that U.S. military operations “will not in any way change as a result of China’s announcement.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.