Automation could have prevented NY accident

December 03, 2013 01:32 pm | Updated May 12, 2016 04:52 am IST - YONKERS (New York):

A construction machine moves debris near the site of the metro train derailment in the Bronx section of New York on Monday as Federal authorities began an exhaustive investigation into what caused a Metro-North commuter train rounding a riverside curve to derail, killing four people and injuring more than 60 others. AP Photo

A construction machine moves debris near the site of the metro train derailment in the Bronx section of New York on Monday as Federal authorities began an exhaustive investigation into what caused a Metro-North commuter train rounding a riverside curve to derail, killing four people and injuring more than 60 others. AP Photo

The revelation that a New York City commuter train derailed while barrelling into a sharp curve at nearly three times the speed limit is fuelling questions about whether automated crash-avoidance technology could have prevented the carnage.

Safety officials have championed what is known as positive train control technology for decades, but the railroad industry has sought to postpone having to install it because of the high cost and technological issues.

The train was hurtling at 132 kmph as it entered a 48 kmph curve, an investigator said

Investigators have not yet determined whether the weekend wreck, which killed four people and injured more than 60 others, was the result of human error or mechanical trouble. But some safety experts said the tragedy might not have happened if Metro-North Railroad had the technology, and a senator said the derailment underscored the need for it.

“This incident, if anything, heightens the importance of additional safety measures, like that one,” said U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat from Connecticut, which also is served by Metro-North. “I’d be very loath to be more flexible or grant more time.”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said the NTSB findings make it clear “extreme speed was a central cause” of the derailment and vowed to “make sure any responsible parties are held accountable” after investigators determine why the train was going so fast.

Mr. Weener sketched a scenario suggesting that the throttle was let up and the brakes were fully applied way too late to stave off the crash. He said the throttle went to idle six seconds before the derailed train came to a complete stop “very late in the game” for a train going that fast and the brakes were fully engaged five seconds before the train stopped.

Investigators are not aware of any problems with the brakes during the nine stops the train made before the derailment, Mr. Weener said.

Mr. Weener would not disclose what investigators know about the engineer’s version of events, and he said the results of drug and alcohol tests were not yet available. Investigators are also examining the engineer’s cellphone; engineers are allowed to carry cellphones but prohibited from using them during a train’s run.

The engineer, William Rockefeller, is cooperating with investigators, said Anthony Bottalico, executive director of the rail employees union. Rockefeller, 46, has been an engineer for about 11 years and a Metro-North employee for about 20, he said.

Positive train control, or PTC, is designed to forestall the human errors that cause about 40 percent of train accidents, and uses GPS, wireless radio and computers to monitor trains and stop them from colliding, derailing or going the wrong way. The transportation safety board has urged railroads to install PTC in some form since 1970, and after a 2005 head-on collision killed 25 people near Los Angeles, Congress in 2008 ordered rail lines to adopt the technology by December 2015

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.