Amid Gitmo force-feeding, Obama recommits to closure

May 01, 2013 11:09 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:48 pm IST - WASHINGTON:

U.S. President Barack Obama. File photo

U.S. President Barack Obama. File photo

The U.S. “War on Terror” prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, attracted renewed concern over the fate of over 100 inmates on hunger strike since February 6, after reports continued to surface about guards force-feeding them via nasal tubes.

Even as medical associations and human rights groups expressed consternation at the deteriorating situation there, President Barack Obama on Tuesday renewed his commitment to close down the prison, describing it as “expensive” and “inefficient”, which “hurts us in terms of our international standing”, and acts as a “recruitment tool for extremists”. It needs to be closed, he said.

Mr. Obama, while campaigning for the 2008 presidential polls, had promised to close the prison. He has since blamed the U.S. Congress for stymieing his efforts to either move the inmates to the U.S. mainland and face trial in a civilian court or transfer them back to their home nations, such as Afghanistan and Yemen. Human rights groups say 86 of the 166 inmates have been cleared for release.

In the view of some, the White House may not have been serious about closing the prison until now, especially after it shuttered an inmate resettlement office for the prison in January. However, this week, Mr. Obama vowed to take the issue back to Congress and “make the case that this is not something that’s in the best interest of the American people”.

The President’s words may be small comfort to the 21 or more inmates said to be rotationally force fed by a 40-person military medical team that has arrived at the base “to keep the protesters alive”. Last month one among them, Samir Naji Al Hasan Moqbel (35) wrote an article headlined, “Gitmo Is Killing Me”, in The New York Times , in which he described his force-feeding as “cruel punishment”.

However, this week, Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, told media that force-feeding hunger strikers was a breach of international law, adding, “If it’s perceived as torture or inhuman treatment — and [if] it’s the case, it’s painful — then it is prohibited by international law.”

In addition, last week, the President of the American Medical Association (AMA) was said to have sent a letter to U.S. Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel “reiterating its [AMA’s] long-held position that it is a violation of medical ethics to force-feed mentally competent adults who refuse food and life-saving treatment”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.