SEARCH

News » International

Updated: January 21, 2011 08:44 IST

Willing to have dialogue on rights: Hu

Narayan Lakshman
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama pose with China's President Hu Jintao at the White House in Washington on Wednesday.
AP President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama pose with China's President Hu Jintao at the White House in Washington on Wednesday.

Technical problems with simultaneous translations plagued the post-state visit press conference with United States President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao on Wednesday.

Yet the fact that many of the technical snags occurred when Mr. Hu faced questions on China’s human rights record was a fact that left many observers wondering about their timing.

The first set of comments on the thorny bilateral issue of human rights in China, by President Obama, passed through the sound systems unscathed.

Clearly enunciating the U.S. support for human rights and expressing hope that China would do the same, Mr. Obama said that during the state visit, “I reaffirmed America’s fundamental commitment to the universal rights of all people. That includes basic human rights like freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association and demonstration, and of religion – rights that are recognized in the Chinese constitution.”

On the steps forward, he added the U.S. and China had agreed to move ahead with a formal dialogue on human rights and new exchanges to advance the rule of law “while acknowledging there are going to be areas where we disagree.”

He was quick, however, to add that the U.S. recognised that “Tibet is part of the People’s Republic of China, [and] the U.S. continues to support further dialogue between the government of China and the representatives of the Dalai Lama to resolve concerns and differences, including the preservation of the religious and cultural identity of the Tibetan people.”

Yet the reporter to whom Mr. Obama had responded had also asked Mr. Hu about how he would justify China’s record on human rights, and if Mr. Hu thought that was a legitimate concern of the American people – yet no answer was forthcoming from the Chinese President, who instead responded a question from another reporter.

But there was no avoiding the issue when a second reporter reiterated his colleagues question and specifically requested a response from President Hu, who then replied, “First, I would like to clarify, because of the technical translation and interpretation problem, I did not hear the question about the human rights... As you raise this question, and I heard the question properly, certainly I am in a position to answer that question.”

Mr. Hu then explained that in over eight meetings he had held thus far with Mr. Obama, China had not shied away from discussing human rights and its position was that “China recognises and also respects the universality of human rights. And at the same time, we do believe that we also need to take into account the different and national circumstances when it comes to the universal value of human rights.”

However while he stressed that China was a developing country that was currently in a “crucial stage of reform,” and still faced many challenges in economic and social development, he conceded, “And a lot still needs to be done in China, in terms of human rights.”

China was willing to continue to have exchanges and dialogue with other countries in terms of human rights, and we are also willing to learn from each other in terms of the good practices, Mr. Hu said, specifically saying that although there were “disagreements between China and the U.S. on the issue of human rights, China is willing to engage in dialogue and exchanges with the U.S. on the basis of mutual respect and the principle of non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.”

More In: International | News

Human rights concerns always come with a pinch of hypocrisy. One best example is when General Suharto came to power in Indonesia in 1967. The West was ebullient, and even supportive of the massive slaughter during Suharto's regime, while being 'concerned' for human rights elsewhere. The modern history tells nothing but gruesome human rights violations in each and every conflict, some being accepted, and others being deplored, based on what politics you support. China knows this, which is why it's brushing off the 'human rights concerns' from West.

from:  Xavier Abraham
Posted on: Jan 21, 2011 at 23:26 IST

Wake up World. Another US president giving a call for human rights in China. Previous administrations under both Democrat and Republican have given such calls and they remain just that, weak calls to satisfy the liberal voters of USA. US always supported regimes with appaling human rights records and still continue to do so, South Africa during apertheid, Pakistan, Iran under Shah, Egypt, emirates and Sultanates of Middle East. It's an opportunity to emabarass the guest and score brownie points. I don't think that HH Dalai Lama will ever be able to return to Tibet. You have wasted column inches which could have better used for reporting the Indian Kabbadi team's chances aginst Bangladesh.

from:  Mani Sandilya
Posted on: Jan 21, 2011 at 11:01 IST

We can call it a new cold war between America and China. Because since the destruction of Soviet block in the late 90s, Americans concieved that they are the real masters of the world ,but now as the balance of power is shifting towards Asia, America has restarted the polices which their president had initiated in the late 50s to contain communism at that time world was in bipolarity but now it is in multipolarity ,it will be very tough for America to contain China.

from:  Hiddayatullah Dar
Posted on: Jan 21, 2011 at 08:04 IST

I'd like anyone to name me a country which hasn't yet violated human rights to some degree. More needs to be done internationally, in the United Nations, for example. A government style of international agency is needed to monitor human rights violations with strong enforcement powers. Let's admit, all countries have been violators at times in the past. Now I ask; which courageous country in the world, will be the champion of peace, and be the First, to instigate this worldwide human rights agency?

from:  Helmut Oesterling
Posted on: Jan 20, 2011 at 23:02 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

National

Business

Cricket

Sport


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in International

US defence department to create medical team for Ebola

The US Department of Defense said on Sunday the military is creating a 30-member team which will be tasked with providing emergency assi... »