U.S. takes serious note of Musharraf’s revelation on aid diversion

September 15, 2009 02:47 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 06:52 am IST - Washington

In this March 8, 2009 photo Pakistan former President Pervez Musharraf addresses the gathering at an ASSOCHAM interactive session in New Delhi.

In this March 8, 2009 photo Pakistan former President Pervez Musharraf addresses the gathering at an ASSOCHAM interactive session in New Delhi.

The U.S. has said that it is taking very seriously former Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf’s claim that arms provided by it to fight Islamic terrorists were moved to bolster defence against India instead.

State Department spokesman Ian Kelly Monday said: “We take very seriously any allegation of using U.S.-origin military assistance for purposes other than we had already agreed to and that we had intended them for.”

To a query on when the weapons were sold to Pakistan, was there an understanding or a provision that they would not be used against India, the official said: “Yeah. I — well, again, I don’t know all the details of what Mr. Musharraf said. But I believe that he was referring to this most recent assistance to help fight religious extremists in Pakistan. So I think that was the intent of this latest round anyway. But I just — I don’t know exactly what he was referring to.”

Gen. Musharraf recently left Pakistan amid a growing demand to try him for imposing emergency in the country and for ordering the confinement of Supreme Court judges.

The Islamabad police had on August 10 registered a criminal case against the former President and military dictator following the orders of Islamabad Additional Sessions Judge Mohammad Akmal Khan.

Judge Khan was acting on a petition filed by advocate Mohammad Aslam Ghuman who sought action against Gen. Musharraf for ordering the confinement of Supreme Court judges after declaring an emergency on November 3, 2007.

The complaint states that Gen. Musharraf and others had detained the Supreme Court judges and their families at their houses and their children were neither allowed to attend school nor permitted to appear in examinations.

The Supreme Court had ruled on July 29 that year that the declaration of emergency was unconstitutional and illegal.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.