U.S. assistance to Pak should not be unconditional: Hagel

January 31, 2013 09:10 am | Updated November 16, 2021 10:22 pm IST - Washington

File photo of President Barack Obama with Defence Secretary-nominee Chuck Hagel.

File photo of President Barack Obama with Defence Secretary-nominee Chuck Hagel.

America’s assistance to Pakistan should not be unconditional, U.S. Defence Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel has told lawmakers ahead of his confirmation hearing.

The U.S.-Pak military relationship should be underlined by a realistic, pragmatic approach to enhancing those areas of cooperation that are dictated by their common interests and to ensuring accountability for actions that detract from these interest, Mr. Hagel stressed.

“U.S. assistance to Pakistan should not be unconditional. At the same time, any conditions should be carefully examined to ensure they advance U.S. strategic interests,” Chuck Hagel, the two-time former Senator from Nebraska said on Wednesday in answers to a 112-page questionnaire for the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“If confirmed, I will work to ensure that our security assistance and other support to Pakistan both serves US interests and is cost effective,” Mr. Hagel added.

Mr. Hagel has been nominated by the U.S. President Barack Obama as his next Defence Secretary.

If confirmed by the Senate, he would replace Leon Panetta as the Defence Secretary.

India does not find any mention in his answers.

“I believe the U.S. and Pakistan share common interests in disrupting, dismantling, and defeating al-Qaeda, and in long-term regional stability, including a durable political settlement in Afghanistan and the safety and security of the Indian Ocean,” Mr. Hagel said when asked what would he consider to be areas of shared strategic interest between the U.S. and Pakistan.

Mr. Hagel said the U.S. and Pakistan often diverge over Pakistan’s approach to the militant and terrorist networks that operate in Pakistan’s territory and do not overtly threaten the Pakistani state.

“However, in my view, these networks threaten Pakistani stability, endanger the prospects for a settlement in Afghanistan, and undermine regional stability -- so that in fact, while the relationship is challenging, I believe our long-term strategic interests are in alignment,” he said.

Noting that U.S.-Pakistan military-to-military ties have been marked by periodic ups and downs, Mr. Hagel said in his view, the military-military relationship should be underlined by a realistic, pragmatic approach to enhancing those areas of cooperation that are dictated by their common interests and to ensuring accountability for actions that detract from these interests.

“If confirmed, I will make accomplishing that goal a priority,” he asserted.

Responding to a question on effectiveness of U.S. aid to Pakistan, Mr. Hagel said as the President has said, more terrorists have been killed in Pakistan than anywhere else since 9/11-and that would not be possible without Pakistani cooperation.

“Security assistance for Pakistan has helped Pakistan press this campaign against the militant and terrorist networks that threaten us all,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.