UNSC seat: Pakistan warns against endorsement of Indian bid

Islamabad opposed to expansion in the permanent category

November 07, 2010 02:41 am | Updated November 28, 2021 08:50 pm IST - ISLAMABAD:

Ahead of U. S. President Barack Obama's India visit, Pakistan on Friday warned that any endorsement of the Indian bid for a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) would have a negative impact on issues relating to peace and security in South Asia.

This view was articulated by the Foreign Office before the Special Committee of the Parliament on Kashmir. Asked about India's prospects in acquiring a permanent seat in the UNSC and possible U. S. endorsement for such a position, the Foreign Office representatives sought to point out that Pakistan was opposed to expansion in the permanent category and “further perpetuation of existing anomalies.”

Pakistan's contention is that endorsing the candidacy of any one of more States for a permanent seat on the UNSC would be at variance with the spirit of the U. N. Charter and infringes upon the principles of sovereign equality. “Creating a new class of privileged members, with or without veto, is not an option. The issue of the UNSC's expansion cannot be divorced from the broader questions relating to the restructuring of the global system.”

According to the Foreign Office, Pakistan has been consistent on this position. “Such decisions that impact on the global system of inter-State relations based on the Charter require consensus. The spirit and the principles of the Charter should not be compromised, and sovereign equality is a cardinal principle.”

While the Committee endorsed the government's position that India like any other sovereign State was entitled to develop its own bilateral relations in a manner it deems fit, the Foreign Office — in its briefing on the Obama visit to India — said the U. S. was informed about the need to maintain regional balance in South Asia. “It is Pakistan's considered view that anything that militates against the regional balance is counter-productive and not in the interest of the region and the world.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.