Uncertainty ends in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province

CM Wigneswaran, leader Sampanthan reach understanding

June 19, 2017 09:45 pm | Updated June 20, 2017 07:53 am IST - Colombo

In this August 22, 2014 file photo, R. Sampanthan, Srilankan Member of Parliament and Leader of Tamil National Alliance in New Delhi.

In this August 22, 2014 file photo, R. Sampanthan, Srilankan Member of Parliament and Leader of Tamil National Alliance in New Delhi.

Chief Minister of Sri Lanka’s Northern Province C.V. Wigneswaran will continue in the post following an understanding with Tamil National Alliance leader R. Sampanthan, days after a large bloc of governing council members withdrew support.

On Monday, the Chief Minister agreed to reverse his controversial directive to two provincial ministers that Mr. Sampanthan had earlier objected to. Following negotiations, Mr. Sampanthan told the Northern Province Governor that the Council members would withdraw their motion of no-confidence. “All’s well that ends well,” the TNA veteran said in a letter addressed to the CM. Mr. Sampanthan also called for an early meeting with the CM “to further discuss all issues”.

The Tamil leaders had clashed over the CM’s response to a recent inquiry that found two of his cabinet ministers guilty of corruption charges. Apart from urging them to resign, Mr. Wigneswaran asked two other Ministers, who were not found guilty, to go on leave to facilitate further inquiry – a move that Mr. Sampathan found unreasonable and going against natural justice.

CM backs off

The CM’s decision provoked as many as 21 members of the 38-member council to withdraw their support to him last week, putting the future of the first council of Sri Lanka’s Northern Province, elected to power in 2013, at stake. Of the dissenting members, 15 were from the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK), the key TNA constituent that both Mr. Sampanthan and Mr. Wigneswaran are members of. After exchanging at least three rounds of letters with Mr. Sampanthan, the CM said he “would not insist on the conditions relating to leave,” at the same time stressing that the ministers should not interfere in a future legal inquiry.

While the recent controversy centred on the inquiry, it reflected the simmering disgruntlement within a section of the Council, particularly among ITAK members, who felt neglected. It is yet another manifestation of the widening political differences between Mr. Sampanthan and the CM he hand-picked in 2013.

“We have achieved our objective in letting the CM know that most us don’t have confidence in him any more,” an ITAK member in Jaffna said, requesting anonymity. “But we appreciate our Leader’s view that this must be resolved,” he said, allaying rumours of a possible split in the TNA.

TNA parliamentarian and ITAK spokesman M.A. Sumanthiran said the apparent differences among constituents only pointed to the “healthy democracy” within the Alliance, which is an amalgam of four parties. Observing that an impending legal inquiry was a “satisfactory outcome”, he said: “this is not the end of the matter. Or Leader [Mr. Sampanthan] has said he would discuss other pending issues.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.