UK agrees to compensate ex-Guantanamo detainees

Atleast seven men, who accused British security forces of colluding in their torture overseas, are likely to get millions in compensation from the U.K. government

November 16, 2010 02:17 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 07:19 am IST - LONDON

In this file photo dated 2000 and released by the human rights and legal defence organization Reprieve, Guantanamo detainee Binyam Mohamed, is pictured in London. AP.

In this file photo dated 2000 and released by the human rights and legal defence organization Reprieve, Guantanamo detainee Binyam Mohamed, is pictured in London. AP.

Britain’s government will announce details on Tuesday of settlements with a group of ex-Guantanamo Bay detainees who were suing the U.K. for alleged complicity in their torture overseas.

Prime Minister David Cameron’s office said the specifics would be disclosed in a written statement to lawmakers. It follows a series of talks aimed at avoiding a lengthy and expensive series of lawsuits.

Government officials declined to discuss the settlement in advance, or confirm whether it would pay compensation, citing a confidentiality agreement.

Britain’s ITV News reported that at least 7 ex—detainees would receive payments, and claimed one man would be paid more than one million pounds (US$1.6 million). It did cite its sources.

Diplomats and government officials previously had confirmed negotiations were taking place with lawyers for 12 former detainees, some British nationals and others who were former U.K. residents, who had begun legal action against the government.

High Court judge Stephen Silber said in July that mediation talks were under way, aimed at reaching a deal outside the courts.

British spies have not been accused of torturing detainees themselves, but the men alleged British officials were complicit in their mistreatment while they were held by the U.S., Pakistan and other countries, because they knew of abuse but did not stop it.

In the most notorious case, ex—detainee Binyam Mohamed alleged the U.K. was aware he was severely beaten, subjected to sleep deprivation and had his genitals sliced with a scalpel. A British court has ruled that Mohamed was subjected to “cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment” by U.S. authorities.

The British government has been anxious to deal with the lawsuits, estimating that court cases could last five years and cost up to 50 million pounds (US$80 million) in legal fees. Officials said about 100 intelligence officials had already been removed from regular duties to work on preparing up to 500,000 documents to be used in court.

Mr. Cameron was also concerned that the lawsuits could prompt new arguments over the handling of intelligence provided to the U.K. by the U.S. and other allies.

Earlier this year, a judge ordered the release of a previously secret summary of CIA documents on the treatment of Mohamed. Under long—standing conventions nations don’t disclose intelligence shared by their allies, and the White House reacted angrily to the release.

The British government also said a deal would speed up the start of a planned independent inquiry which is due to examine how much the government knew about the treatment of detainees by allies.

Retired judge Peter Gibson was appointed in July to lead the study and asked to begin his investigation once the lawsuits had been dealt with, and after police conclude criminal inquiries into the actions of two specific intelligence officers.

Police are investigating whether an officer with domestic spy agency MI5 is guilty of criminal wrongdoing over the alleged torture of an ex—Guantanamo Bay detainee. In a separate case, the actions of an officer with overseas intelligence service MI6 are also being investigated.

Britain’s government and intelligence agencies have repeatedly denied they were involved in, or condoned, the use of torture.

However, Foreign Secretary William Hague said in August that the government will overhaul current practices based on Gibson’s recommendations. “We will act on the lessons learnt, and tackle the difficult issues we currently face head on,” he said.

Mr. Hague said the inquiry was necessary to “clear the stain from our reputation as a country.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.