Teenager sentenced in Nitin Garg murder case

December 09, 2010 11:38 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 07:12 am IST - Melbourne:

Ahead of the first death anniversary of Indian student Nitin Garg, an Australian court on Thursday sentenced a teenager who witnessed the stabbing incident to 18 months probation.

The 16-year-old boy, who has not been named for legal reasons, pleaded guilty before the Supreme Court to being an accessory to the murder of 21-year-old Garg in Cruickshank Park on January 2, according to The Age.

The court heard Garg was on his way to work at a nearby eatery when the two boys, both aged 15 at the time, noticed him walking past while speaking on his mobile phone. The prosecution said the accused told his friend “that bloke's phone looks nice”, which prompted him to allegedly approach Garg and stab him in the abdomen.

When police interviewed the boy days after Garg's murder, he did not say anything about the incident.

However, he later confessed he and his co-accused were in the park on the night of the stabbing.

His co-accused has already been charged with murder and is to face a committal hearing in February.

Phone records showed Garg tried to phone for help immediately after he was stabbed but the accused yelled at him to “drop the phone”.

In April, the boy told a friend's father “he was going to tell him something he had never told anyone before” and admitted to being present during Garg's stabbing.

The court heard that the man contacted police with the information.

The boy then agreed to wear a listening device to record a conversation with his co-accused in which the alleged murderer incriminated himself.

The prosecution described the boy's co-operation as significant and said that a non-custodial sentence was an option for the court.

Justice Paul Coghlan said the crime was serious but the boy's undertaking to give evidence against his co-accused meant the probation sentence was warranted.

Justice Mr. Coghlan said if the teenager had not pleaded guilty and not agreed to assist the prosecution of his co-accused, the 16-year-old would have spent two years in a youth justice centre.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.