Sustained pressure alone will make Pak act against terror: ex-U.S. diplomats

Suggestion of Zalmay Khalilzad and James Dobbins assumes significance in the aftermath of the Pathankot attack.

January 10, 2016 03:55 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 02:20 am IST - WASHINGTON:

“At this juncture, sustained and intensified pressure on Pakistan offers the only viable path to advancing the reconciliation process in a way that does not turn Afghanistan into a launching pad for terrorism and extremism,” former diplomats Zalmay Khalilzad (above) and James Dobbins (right) said in a joint op-ed in the Newsweek.

“At this juncture, sustained and intensified pressure on Pakistan offers the only viable path to advancing the reconciliation process in a way that does not turn Afghanistan into a launching pad for terrorism and extremism,” former diplomats Zalmay Khalilzad (above) and James Dobbins (right) said in a joint op-ed in the Newsweek.

Putting sustained and intensified pressure on Pakistan is the only viable option for America to make it act against terror networks and cooperate on the fragile Afghan peace process, former U.S. diplomats have said.

“At this juncture, sustained and intensified pressure on Pakistan offers the only viable path to advancing the reconciliation process in a way that does not turn Afghanistan into a launching pad for terrorism and extremism,” former diplomats Zalmay Khalilzad and James Dobbins said in a joint op-ed in the Newsweek .

Mr. Khalilzad was the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Afghanistan and Iran during the Bush administration, while Mr. Dobbins was the Special U.S. Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan under the current Obama administration.

Upcoming U.S.-Afghanistan-Pak-China meet

The op-ed has been written in the context of the upcoming meeting of Afghanistan, Pakistan, the U.S. and China to revive the Afghan peace process with the Taliban, the article by the two former American diplomats assumes significance for India in the aftermath of the Pathankot terrorist attack.

“Continued U.S. pressure is needed to induce Pakistani cooperation in reducing the violence,” they wrote.

Failure to act against Haqqani network

“Congress withheld nearly a third of the military assistance allocated to Pakistan for 2015 due to Islamabad’s failure to take meaningful action against the Haqqani network. An even larger proportion of the assistance should be conditioned in the coming year on Islamabad closing down the Haqqani network and Taliban military in the country,” Mr. Khalilzad and Mr. Dobbins said.

Another step that would steer Pakistan in a more cooperative direction is for the U.S. to move urgently in addressing the gaps in Afghan capabilities, they wrote.

They added that Washington should not rule out deploying some additional forces and easing rules of engagement for targeting the Taliban and Islamic State (IS).

U.S., Afghanistan must persuade Pak

They argued that U.S. and Afghanistan should focus less on fostering talks and more on persuading Pakistan to take action against those engaged in terrorism and violence.

“While opening peace talks could be a positive step, it will only yield fruit if Pakistani authorities also begin to close down Afghan Taliban military operations,” they asserted.

They said Pakistan’s interest in a negotiated settlement to the Afghan war seems real enough, but its army has never been willing to take the very steps most likely to advance the process, which are to close down Afghan Taliban and Haqqani network operations in Pakistan and imprison any of their leaders not actively negotiating peace with Afghanistan.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.