Russia has rejected calls for Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad to step down as a precondition to resolving the crisis in Syria and urged all countries to play an “honest game” in the region.
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told visiting British Foreign Secretary William Hague that outside players should stop “inciting” Syrian opposition to sabotage the peace plan of U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan.
“There are people who are inciting [Syrian opposition groups] to torpedo the Annan plan and get a pretext for foreign interference,” Mr. Lavrov said at a joint press conference with Mr. Hague after their talks in Moscow on Monday. “This is dishonest play.”
“If we honestly want to help Kofi Annan implement his plan, we must apply pressure on all parties involved in armed confrontation in Syria,” the Russian Foreign Minister said. “If the change of regime is put forward as a precondition, then we won't achieve anything.”
Even though Mr. Lavrov addressed his criticism to countries that sit “closer to Syria than Russia or United Kingdom”, there was little doubt he targeted Britain and other Western nations.
In the run-up to Mr. Hague's visit to Moscow Russian Ambassador to U.K. Alexander Yakovenko said Russia was concerned that “London and some other Western capitals” are making public statements to encourage the Syria opposition to “continue the violence instead of taking part in political dialogue”.
Responding to Mr. Hague's call on Russia to exert “additional pressure” on Mr. Assad's regime, Mr. Lavrov said Russia was doing its bid.
“We do exert pressure on the Syrian government on a daily basis,” Mr. Lavrov said. He recalled that Moscow had persuaded Damascus to accept an Arab League plan last autumn to deploy Arab monitors in Syria and to agree to the Kofi Annan plan earlier this year.
“But we want our efforts to be matched with just as intense efforts by other players” in putting pressure on the Syrian opposition, the Russian Foreign Minister said.
Mr. Lavrov called for a thorough probe into the killing of more than 100 people in the Syrian town of Houla on May 25, which the West blamed on government forces. However, Mr. Lavrov drew parallels with the Serb “massacre” of 45 Albanians in the Kosovo village of Racak in early 1990, which was used as justification for the NATO bombings of former Yugoslavia, but was not backed up by international forensic experts, whose report was never released.
The British Foreign Secretary's visit to Moscow should be seen in the light of reports that U.S. President Barack Obama plans to seek Russia's help for a Yemen-scenario regime change in Syria when he meets with Russia's new President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of a Group of Twenty summit in Mexico next month.
What is the Yemen scenario? Yemen also had a bombing this week killing over a hundred people. Yemen also has a continuing carnage via the drone attacks. Syria is already going through the Yemen scenario.
US and the west have developed a strategy of toppling sovereign governments.
The strategy was tried and tested during the British colonial times.
First and foremost is to project themselves as honest brokers and champions of human
rights, democracy and justice.
UK is a cold and calculated player, capable of taking over huge areas by its divide and
rule policy with minimal resources. It can broker deals behind the scenes, and make or
break the image of a ruler, and can drag washington.
US is powerful, and holds enormous muscle power, and lacks inhibitions while
decimating its enemy. It could destroy 'two', japanese cities in 3 days, and still maintain
friendship with it 'post war'.
Russia is powerful, but has gone past its peak. It makes noises but is incapable of
standing up for its friends, and has learnt to stand as a silent witness.
Indian government thinks loudly on moral issues, but has not yet attained the strength.
China, Russia, india, Brazil & South Africa should lead.
Russia is sending Assad more and more weapons which are being used to
kill anybody, women and children included, and it the West which is to
blame for the violence in Syria?
I do agree with China that we should avoid hysterical escalation, as the Yemeni solution has greater challenges. However I do not see Iran in favour of Annan's six-point proposal, therefore I do think China and Russia have a serious conflict of interest. In today’s global economy, many of our interests are mutual interests.
Please Email the Editor