Pakistan SC upholds conviction of terrorists by military courts

The decision marks the first time the highest court has ruled on the legality of cases tried by the military.

August 29, 2016 05:10 pm | Updated 05:19 pm IST - Islamabad

Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Monday dismissed appeals of at least 16 terrorists, including those convicted for the Peshawar school carnage and sentenced to death, by the special military courts, the first time the apex court has ruled on the legality of cases tried by the Army.

The Supreme Court in its 182-page decision ruled the appellants had not proved that the military violated their constitutional rights or failed to follow procedure.

The decision is major blow to lawyers and civil society activists who had been struggling to reverse the convictions by the military courts.

A five-member full Bench, headed by Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, had reserved judgment on the appeals of the convicts on June 20.

The terrorists were convicted for the involvement in the Army Public School Attack in Peshawar, Parade Line bombing in Rawalpindi, the Bannu jailbreak and attacks on Army convoys and installations.

They were tried by special military courts set up after Peshawar school attack for speedy trial of rebels.

It is not known when they were convicted and where the trial was held as such courts work at secret places due to security issues.

Army chief General Raheel Sharif had already rejected the appeals, but the convicts had challenged the sentences in the Supreme Court.

The decision marks the first time the highest court has ruled on the legality of cases tried by the military.

According to The Express Tribune , senior lawyer and rights activist Asma Jahangir, the counsel for the convicts, on June 20, 2016, demanded retrial of convicts. She also said that lawyers were not given access to the record of trial.

She argued that they do not know under what law her client was taken into custody and whether due course of law was provided.

She again contended that people were illegally arrested under the regulation, and later the constitutional amendment was introduced to hide the illegality.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.