Only two days before Ang Lee took home the Best Director Academy Award for Life of Pi, authorities in China — where the Taiwan-born director is very popular — passed new rules to tighten supervision over documentary films.
The two unrelated events have been seized upon by filmgoers and media commentators, fanning the flames of a long-running debate about whether censorship is stifling talent in China even as directors in Taiwan and Hong Kong win global acclaim.
“Taiwan has Ang Lee, Hong Kong has Wong Kar-wai. And the mainland?” asked Paris Feng, a designer, in a message on Chinese Twitter equivalent Sina Weibo.
The message, forwarded more than 1,000 times, elicited a range of responses, many critical of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television (Sarft), the body in charge of regulating films.
“China only has SARFT”, said one blogger in reply to Mr. Feng’s question. Mr. Lee’s Academy Award triumph was the most discussed topic on Sina Weibo on Monday, generating more than 30 million posts and comments.
His success has brought fresh criticism of Sarft’s policies. Its new rules to regulate documentary films, which came into effect on February 23, state that all television documentaries for public broadcast must first be reviewed by Sarft. Even before filming starts, a content summary, cast list and shooting plan must be approved by the body, the Communist Party-run The Global Times newspaper reported.
The rules were criticised by media commentators, who say censorship restrictions have outlived their use and purpose at a time when an increasing number of Chinese are turning to social media websites, like Weibo; and a booming underground DVD market to circumvent the limitations still in place on television stations and public screenings.
“The same day that a Chinese director, Ang Lee, won an Oscar, SARFT issued new requirements making documentaries, like films and television shows, go through reviews,” wrote banker Wang Ran to his 2.6 million followers on Weibo. “The Chinese government”, he added, “is only helping Hollywood maintain its global monopoly”.
Mr. Lee himself has had a strained relationship with Sarft. His first Oscar success a decade ago, when Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon won the Best Foreign Film award, was hailed here as a triumph for Chinese cinema.
The 2007 film Lust, Caution brought Mr. Lee critical acclaim but angered Sarft, which deleted several sex scenes and reportedly forced Mr. Lee to alter dialogues towards the end of the film where a Communist agent betrays the party. Chinese actress Tang Wei, who played the agent, was subsequently banned by Sarft for several years and blacklisted from working in the mainland. Only recently has she been allowed to emerge from the government-imposed ban.
State media, nevertheless, hailed Mr. Lee’s triumph on Monday despite his roots in Taiwan. The Xinhua news agency said in a report of Monday’s award, “Coming from China’s Taiwan, the 59-year-old Lee won the Oscar Award for Best Foreign Language Film in 2001 for Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and got another Oscar award for Best Director in 2005 for Brokeback Mountain”. “He is the first person of Asian descent,” the report added, “to win the Oscar for Best Director.”
The Chinese government regards Taiwan, which has been self-administered since 1949, when the Kuomintang (KMT) under Chiang Kai-shek, leading Kuomintang, fled to the island, as a breakaway province. Cross-strait ties have improved in recent years, driven by closer economic linkages.
Only on Monday, new Chinese leader Xi Jinping met with Lien Chan, the honorary chairman of the KMT, and declared it was “the duty of the new Communist Party leadership to continue promoting the peaceful development of cross-strait ties and peaceful reunification”.
Keywords: Ang Lee, Best Director Academy Award, Life of Pi, documentary films, State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, SARFT, Sarft’s policies, film regualtions




Inspiration is always there. It's not because we have no knowledge of this inspirations. Mr Satyajit Ray himself described about the inspirations of films for making of Pather Panchali. In the book Our Film Their Film he said about the legendary film Of Vittorio De Sica's Bicycle Thief from where he had the inspiration's of 'Neorealisim' movment in cinema. After that Mr Ritwik Ghatak also took this concept.
So it's not about the inspiration it's about the thought that what have to grab from these present era's cinema and what not.
@ Suvojit Dutta,Satyajit Ray & Ritwik Ghatak have made more movies than
the ones you have mentioned & I have certainly watched most of them....
@lobsang: Please tell us what political reasons you refer to that may
prevent Indian movies prominence in Oscar lineup! Believe me even if
there was a Indian film anywhere close to last year's Iranian winner
'A separation' would get recognized, simply because Hollywood has soft
corner for Bollywood due to various cultural affinities (Yoga,
spiritualism etc) and recent political closeness between India and
the US. Heck if a film approved by Iranian censorship can win best
foreign film award last year so can India if it produces a half way as
decent cinema.
@Venkataramanan Ramasethu: Satyajit Ray didn't need any foreign
inspiration to film Pather Panchali or Ritwik Ghatak in his 'Titas ekti
nadir naam'! Have you seen any of these films, I can vouch that they are
a bit different from the Bollywood musicals so popular in India. Even
Iranian film makers made great cinemas in recent times like last year's
foreign film Oscar winner 'A Separation', and in India Bollywood masala
numbers kill cinemas that appeal to the mind and soul in favor cheap
thrills and titillation.
We are simply used to all these things happening around.
At the time of oscars, we just raise our brows only to prove that 'we have evolved with time and we appreciate westernization and Hollywood stuff'.
But, when its gone, we return to our childlike and unsubstantial approach towards films, unfortunately ignoring the facts that our ancestors have shared golden stages with great legends of the west.
And today we sit here blemishing our culturally and artistically rich heritage, thinking we are smart boys of twenty first century.
'BEYOND GOOD and EVEN'...
We are the followers of Mr. Bimal Roy(Do bigha zameen), Mr. Satyajit Ray and Mr.Ritwik Ghatak. But alas! it seems too bitter to say their name. Even they set the mark of our films in WORLD CINEMA but now the days people have so narrow minded insectified
small brain that they could not understand what is a fine art.
And indian producers and directors of this age have a mentality how to make a copied crap and promote it a big way that it will earn the production cost without flashing the review itself and they all are in that race. This is the very crystal clear picutre of indian cinema now-a-days. Instead of this there is one more about the so called hero's of bollywood. One fellow decleared that 'Indians don't need to go to Oscars' what a shame! I can't even realize that what they think about a cinema is ?! Now the basic think is the choice, we people have to choose. 'A one man destroyed a whole army of another country' or a 'journey with a tiger in an ocean'.
Undoubtedly Oscar being one of the highest rewards in the World of
Cinema,the expectations are very high.But in India we seem to be a bit
too obsessed with this award.Irrespective of awards,there had always
been great cinema,even from our country,the fact that even the likes of
Satyajit Ray & Ritwik Ghatak have always sought inspiration from
International Cinema cannot be denied....
As long as there are directors like Sajid khan, abbas mustan and Rohit shetty(action turned director) in India making money till then India cinema cannot proceed towards betterment.
Hats off to Ang Lee for his achievements. If Oscar appreciates some artistic talents from the East, that's fine with us. It does not however follow that we are going to measure our achievements in the future by judging whether or not we win an Oscar, realizing that arts can be highly subjective, and sometimes have political agendas behind them, like the Nobel Peace Prize!
So much of inspiring things are happening in the those magnificent film industries abroad....
And it is so pathetic over here in India...
People still enjoy Item Numbers.... LOL...
God have mercy...
Will there ever be an Indian winning best director Oscar? I think not,
there are no more Satyajit Ray or Rittwik Ghatak, and current crop of
directors lack original ideas or universal themes that transcend
cultures in their movies.
"Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" is the best movie ever made on this little planet called Earth! :)
Thumbs up to Ang Lee.
Please Email the Editor