Request to unlock terrorist’s iPhone is not unreasonable: White House

The FBI wants access to data stored on an encrypted iPhone owned by Syed Farook, who, along with his wife, killed 14 people at a Christmas party in December before they died in a gun battle with police in San Bernardino.

February 23, 2016 10:28 am | Updated September 06, 2016 12:26 pm IST - Washington

This July 27, 2014, photo provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows Tashfeen Malik, left, and Syed Farook, as they passed through O'Hare International Airport in Chicago. A U.S. magistrate has ordered Apple to help the Obama administration hack into an iPhone belonging to one of the shooters in San Bernardino. Photo: AP

This July 27, 2014, photo provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows Tashfeen Malik, left, and Syed Farook, as they passed through O'Hare International Airport in Chicago. A U.S. magistrate has ordered Apple to help the Obama administration hack into an iPhone belonging to one of the shooters in San Bernardino. Photo: AP

The FBI’s request to Apple to unlock iPhone of a dead terrorist is not unreasonable as it does not require the technology company to redesign a product or create some sort of backdoor, the White House has said.

“The request that the FBI has put forward is one that is quite limited in scope. It doesn’t require Apple to redesign a product or to create some sort of new backdoor,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters at his daily news briefing yesterday.

The FBI wants access to data stored on an encrypted iPhone owned by Syed Farook, who, along with his wife, killed 14 people at a Christmas party in December before they died in a gun battle with police in San Bernardino.

The Obama Administration, he argued, believes the American people benefit from robust encryption that protects their privacy and civil liberties.

At the same time, law enforcement and national security professionals have an obligation to keep people safe and do what they can to keep Americans safe, he said.

“In this situation, as it relates to the phone that was used by the terrorist in San Bernardino, we’re talking about a phone that was owned not by the terrorist, but by the local government. The terrorist is no longer living,” Earnest said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.