Pakistan hopes talks will not be hit

May 07, 2010 12:03 am | Updated November 11, 2016 05:42 am IST - ISLAMABAD:

As news broke of Ajmal Kasab being awarded the death sentence for his role in the Mumbai 2008 terror attacks, Pakistan on Thursday hoped that non-state actors, and shrill statements made by a section of Indian polity and officialdom would not derail the dialogue that was resumed in Thimphu only last week.

Asked for a reaction by the media at a routine briefing just as television channels were beaming the trial court verdict, Foreign Office spokesman Abdul Basit — in the first official reaction to the death sentence — said legal experts would need to go through the detailed judgment first. At the same time, he pointed out that Pakistan had strongly condemned the horrific Mumbai attack and said “it is important that culprits are brought to book.''

On the specific issue of observations by Indian officials that the verdict was a message to Pakistan that it should not export terror, Mr. Basit said: “It is important to avoid such far-fetched statements as both countries have agreed to resume dialogue.''

Meanwhile, in an interview to “Devil's Advocate'' on Tuesday, Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi was optimistic of the spirit of dialogue prevailing over hiccups like Kasab's conviction and indictment of Hafiz Saeed and Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi of the Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Stating that the prime ministers of India and Pakistan have acknowledged dialogue as the only sensible way forward, he said: “Yes, there will be difficulties and hiccups but we have to move on. We have a much bigger agenda and we should not let any individual, non-state actor or any terrorist organisation impede the peace process. We should develop it to such an extent that it becomes irreversible.''

On whether Pakistan would accept the death sentence or plead for leniency, Mr. Qureshi said: “We will have to respect each other's judicial process.'' As for Pakistan seeking Kasab's extradition, the Minister pointed out that it was not the decision of the government but a requirement of the court. “The Government of Pakistan was conveying the decision of the court.'' This distinction was again drawn by the Foreign Office spokesman at his weekly briefing.

Contesting the charge made by the media that Pakistan has been spineless in its response when cases are filed against its nationals overseas, Mr. Basit said the government has always provided legal aid where it is legitimate. “We need to draw a distinction between where assistance is legitimately required and where it is not.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.