Obama signs annual defence policy bill

January 03, 2013 11:48 am | Updated July 12, 2016 07:07 am IST - Washington

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden walk away from the podium after Obama made a statement regarding the passage of the fiscal cliff bill in Washington. File photo

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden walk away from the podium after Obama made a statement regarding the passage of the fiscal cliff bill in Washington. File photo

U.S. President Barack Obama has signed into law the annual defence policy bill, authorising $633 billion in defence spending for 2013.

Mr. Obama in a signing statement said that he is doing so even as he has strong reservations on several provisions of National Defence Authorisation Act 2013.

The White House had earlier threatened to veto the bill.

This provides Department of Defence with a spending threshold of $633 billion for 2013.

“Our Constitution does not afford the President the opportunity to approve or reject statutory sections one by one. I am empowered either to sign the bill, or reject it, as a whole.

“In this case, though I continue to oppose certain sections of the Act, the need to renew critical defence authorities and funding was too great to ignore,” Mr. Obama explained.

In a time when all public servants recognise the need to eliminate wasteful or duplicative spending, various sections in the Act limit the Defence Department’s ability to direct scarce resources towards the highest priorities for our national security, he said.

For example, restrictions on the Defence Department’s ability to retire unneeded ships and aircraft will divert scarce resources needed for readiness and result in future unfunded liabilities.

Additionally, the Department has endeavoured to constrain manpower costs by recommending prudent cost sharing reforms in its health care programmes.

By failing to allow some of these cost savings measures, the Congress may force reductions in the overall size of the military forces, he said.

Mr. Obama said several provisions in the bill also raise constitutional concerns.

For instance one section places limits on the military’s authority to transfer third country nationals currently held at the detention facility in Parwan, Afghanistan.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.