President Barack Obama went some way towards redeeming his initial weak showing in the race for the White House when he turned the heat on challenger Mitt Romney at the second presidential debate in Hempstead, New York, on Tuesday evening. According to post-debate polls of uncommitted voters by, respectively, CBS and CNN, Mr. Obama won the debate.
A moment of profound drama emerged during the discussion when Mr. Romney stumbled on a question of fact regarding the Obama administration’s characterisation of the deadly attack against the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. While the former Massachusetts Governor insisted that Mr. Obama had not described it as an “act of terror” the day after the incident, debate moderator and CNN anchor Candy Crowley fact-checked him on the spot and Mr. Obama called for the transcript of his words that day.
However Mr. Obama also drew some flak from some commentators over his unwillingness to clearly explain who within his administration had denied the request from Benghazi-based State Department officials. When asked a question on this subject from one among the 80-odd audience members of the “town-hall” style debate, he focused instead on Mr. Romney “trying to make political points, and that's not how a commander in chief operates.”
The exchange notwithstanding, both men appeared to be on an even keel at points, and the tenor of the debate was strong and substantive. At several points the focus settled on the question of outsourcing American jobs and Mr. Obama pressed the case for boosting U.S. manufacturing on the basis that countries such as India, China and Germany were investing in such areas. Mr. Romney continued his earlier pattern of calling out “cheaters” in China, in the context of what he alleged was currency manipulation.
The top subject of the evening, however, was job creation, although other topics of discussion included questions of illegal immigration, clean energy, equal pay for women and deficit reduction. On jobs Mr. Romney’s consistently pressed the President on his record in office, emphasising that the unemployment rate was still at 7.8 per cent, with “23 million people struggling to find a job.” However regarding fair compensation for women, Mr. Romney appeared to avoid a clear recognition of the pay gap and post-poll reviews by various media suggested that that response was not popular.
Lighter moments were fewer and far between as both presidential candidates attempted to seize the momentum and at points they appeared almost trespass into each other’s personal space. A brief handshake after the debate was quickly disengaged as both men walked away to greet their spouses and families.
At one point Mr. Romney, who was clearly batting on the front foot early in the debate said to Mr. Obama, “You’ll get your chance in a moment,” when the President tried to interject. Mr. Obama had his own chance to hit back at another point, when Mr. Romney, in an attempt to link Mr. Obama to investments in China, asked him if he had looked at his pension. “I don't look at my pension. It's not as big as yours so it doesn't take as long,” he retorted.
The third and final debate, to be held in Boca Raton, Florida, on October 22, will focus entirely on foreign policy issues.





Anyone who watches CNN and CBS knows that both these are biased towards Obama.
Fox News says otherwise!
How on earth did Candy Crowley from CNN get to be the moderator.?
It was indeed a memorable debate.Both done well to highlight how principally one differ from other on the cruisal subjects like economy and women.They have basic and fundamental differences and can not be resolved by arguments.The judgement of voters is only the end.Let's wait.This is an historic election.
I saw the debate live at Dallas, TX. President Obama more than made up
for the mediocre first debate. He was presidential in demeanor, but
convinced the audience that Romney cares more for the rich &
corporations (who he called "people"). He had to correct Romney as
"incorrect", several times, & drove home the point that he (Romney)
was inconsistent, someone who cared more about his rich friends than
the large middle class here.
The last thing we need here is someone who will meddle with medicare
and social security, outsource jobs to the third world and deregulate
the financial sector - all of which caused the worst recession since
1929. In our president, we need someone of character & strength, and
Obama is uniquely qualified on these fronts.
To those who accuse Obama of not doing more - 8 years of the Bush
failed policies can't be undone in four. Clearly President Obama
deserves a second term.
I heard the entire debate and can say that Mr Obama was at times
losing temper, was interjecting while Romney was speaking, had little
hard data but using barbs like my pension is less than yours, and not
answering the points like Mr Obama's pension fund too investing in
China and India. Obviously what was good for Obama's pension was being
dubbed as bad by Obama on out-sourcing. Not withstanding what the
general impression projected by press is, Romney had more gravitas and
presidential look than Obama who was apart from being flippant lacked
gravitas, and behaved more like a peeved street fighter.
May the best man (Obama) win ;)
Please Email the Editor