Obama: Cutting deficit as important as job growth

January 30, 2010 05:16 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 07:07 am IST - WASHINGTON

US President Barack Obama. File photo: AP.

US President Barack Obama. File photo: AP.

President Barack Obama said on Saturday that trimming U.S. budget deficits is as important as creating jobs, his top domestic priority this year, to continue the economic recovery that appears under way.

The government reported on Friday the economy grew at an annual rate of 5.7 percent in the final three months of 2009. It was the second consecutive quarter of growth and the fastest rate in more than six years.

“A sign of progress,” Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address. “But as we work to create jobs, it is critical that we rein in the budget deficits we’ve been accumulating for far too long.”

Hammered by Republicans for billions of dollars in spending that added to the deficit, Mr. Obama outlined steps he said would rein in spending. They include rules requiring that spending or tax cuts be offset by cuts to other programs or tax increases, a freeze on most discretionary spending and a presidentially appointed commission to recommend ways to reduce the deficit.

Mr. Obama said “pay-as-you-go” rules that were in place in the 1990s led to surpluses at the end of the decade. But after Congress eliminated the rules, Mr. Obama said the result was the $1.3 trillion deficit he faced upon taking office in January 2009.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has predicted a deficit of about the same size for the 2010 budget year.

“Reinstating this law will help get us back on track, ensuring that every time we spend, we find somewhere else to cut,” Mr. Obama said.

The Senate voted on Thursday to reinstate the rules. The House must still act on the measure.

Mr. Obama also has proposed a three-year freeze on most domestic spending, beginning in the budget year that starts October 1.

The president also promised to create a “fiscal commission” to develop ideas for reducing the deficit.

But his plan would be weaker than a now-defeated Senate proposal that would have created such a commission and required Congress to vote on its recommendations. There is no way to force Congress to vote on recommendations from a presidential panel.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.