No need for new Iran sanctions: Obama

December 21, 2013 10:24 am | Updated May 26, 2016 09:04 am IST - Washington

United States President Barack Obama

United States President Barack Obama

United States President Barack Obama has said there is no need to impose new sanctions on Iran, because current negotiations have a good chance to halt the country’s controversial nuclear programme which has been a challenge to America’s security for over a decade.

“There is no need for new sanctions legislation, not yet,” Mr. Obama told a White House news conference on Friday.

Mr. Obama said that Iran has agreed to actions that will let other nations determine whether it is trying to weaponise nuclear materials. The President said he would support tougher sanctions later if Iran violates the agreement.

“On Iran, there is the possibility of a resolution to a problem that has been a challenge for American national security for over a decade now, and that is getting Iran to, in a verifiable fashion, not pursue a nuclear weapon,” Mr. Obama said.

He asked the Congress not to impose new sanctions against Iran and give current diplomacy a chance to work.

“Even with the interim deal that we struck in Geneva, we had the first halt and, in some cases, some rollback of Iran’s nuclear capabilities — the first time that we’ve seen that in almost a decade,” he said, referring to the recent deal with Iran by the US-led group of six countries.

“We now have a structure in which we can have a very serious conversation to see is it possible for Iran to get right with the international community in a verifiable fashion to give us all confidence that any peaceful nuclear program that they have is not going to be weaponised in a way that threatens us or allies in the region, including Israel,” Mr. Obama said.

His comments came a day after White House press secretary Jay Carney warned for the first time that Mr. Obama would veto any new sanctions legislation Congress enacts before the interim deal with Iran expires.

Mr. Obama said keeping aside the current prospect for a diplomatic resolution would increase the chances of a military conflict over the issue and warned lawmakers that the war-weary American public is in no mood for that.

“Now, I’ve been very clear from the start, I mean what I say: It is my goal to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. But I sure would rather do it diplomatically,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.