No agreement on a new Nepal Constitution

Opposition lawmakers obstruct proceedings; demand withdrawal of "majority vote" move

January 22, 2015 11:14 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 05:14 pm IST - KATHMANDU

Constitution assembly members shout slogans during the meeting at the Parliament on the final day to draft the new constitution in Kathmandu on Thursday. REUTERS/Navesh Chitrakar

Constitution assembly members shout slogans during the meeting at the Parliament on the final day to draft the new constitution in Kathmandu on Thursday. REUTERS/Navesh Chitrakar

On the day the Constituent Assembly (CA) was to deliver the new Constitution, it saw continued obstruction of the House by Opposition lawmakers even as top leaders held a series of discussions to end standoff but could not reach an agreement.

The Opposition lawmakers resumed their obstruction of the proceedings of the Assembly after the talks broke down among the four political parties. They are against resumption of proceedings of the Assembly until the government withdrew its move to draft the Constitution through the process of majority vote.

Earlier, one of the members from the UCPN (Maoist), Umesh Kumar Yadav broke chairs again in the House, protesting strong security presence and rigorous security check of the CA members, reports said. Mr. Yadav had resorted to vandalism on Monday midnight as well.

Earlier, in a meeting initiated by CA Chairman Subas Nembang, political parties held inter- and intra-party talks on the proposal floated by Madhesi Janadhikar Forum (Loktantrik) Chairman Bijay Kumar Gachchhedar on sending resolved subjects to the Constitution Drafting Committee of the CA and take one more month to resolve the dispute on state restructuring.

According to MJF (Loktantrik) Chief Whip Ram Janam Chaudhary, Mr. Gachchhedar suggested that the subject of electoral system and judiciary be sent to the Drafting Committee since the parties have reached an understanding on them. On model of governance, the parties had agreed that “improved” Westminster parliamentary system would be adopted but it be sent to the committee with a note of dissent on it from the UCPN (Maoist). The party has been advocating a system of directly elected executive President.

On the most intractable issue of federalism, Mr. Gachchhedar said the parties should discuss forming six to nine States, and decide the names and boundaries of new States in the next two months.

While all sides termed the proposal positive, they failed to agree on the way ahead. The Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML wanted to send subjects to the Drafting Committee as proposed. However, the UCPN (Maoist)-led Opposition alliance wanted to limit it to reading out a statement of agreement on it.

The day was marked with tension but all sides exercised restraint. Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities (NEFIN) announced its picketing of CA premises and the central secretariat at Singh Durbar.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.