NATO deal on Libya doesn't mean quick exit for U.S.

March 25, 2011 07:37 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 03:57 am IST - WASHINGTON

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. File photo: AP.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. File photo: AP.

NATO agreed to take over command of the newly established no—fly zone over Libya, but the alliance’s new role doesn’t allow the U.S. to make a quick exit from the costly military operation as President Barack Obama’s administration had wanted.

American sea and airpower remain key parts of the effort to counter forces loyal to Libyan strongman Muammar Qadhafi after allies balked at assuming complete command of the campaign that began six days ago. The U.S., along with France and Great Britain, maintains primary responsibility for attacks on Col. Qadhafi’s ground forces and air defence systems, which are the toughest and most controversial parts of the operation.

The U.S. launched 15 more Tomahawk cruise missiles from naval positions in the Mediterranean Sea, a military official said on Friday on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak on the record. The targets late Thursday and early Friday were Scud missile garrisons near Tripoli, while U.S. bombers struck Col. Qadhafi’s artillery, command and control and tank positions elsewhere, the official said. French and British warplanes attacked an artillery battery and other targets near the town of Ajdabiya, which has been under siege by Col. Qadhafi forces for more than a week.

The Obama administration had sought a clear signal from NATO on the handover of command. Instead, it got a mixed message.

NATO Secretary—General Anders Fogh Rasmussen initially announced the agreement in Brussels, saying the alliance could eventually take more responsibility, “but that decision has not been reached yet.” Several NATO members - including Turkey, the alliance’s only Muslim member - had resisted any involvement in ground attacks.

After Mr. Rasmussen’s remarks, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton praised NATO for taking over the no—fly zone, even though the U.S. had hoped the alliance would take full control of the operation authorized by the United Nations, including the protection of Libyan civilians and supporting humanitarian aid efforts on the ground.

“We are taking the next step- We have agreed along with our NATO allies to transition command and control for the no—fly zone over Libya to NATO,” Ms. Clinton said.

“All 28 allies have also now authorized military authorities to develop an operations plan for NATO to take on the broader civilian protection mission,” she added.

Lines of authority were unclear on Thursday night, but it appeared the NATO decision sets up dual command centres and opens the door to confusion and finger—pointing. U.S. commanders would presumably be chiefly responsible for ensuring that the NATO protective flights do not conflict with planned combat operations under U.S. command.

Senior administration officials said the agreement came in a four—way telephone call with Ms. Clinton and the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Turkey. The four worked out the way forward, which included the immediate transfer of command and control of the no—fly zone over Libya, and by early next week of the rest of the U.N.—mandated mission.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military planning, said the actual handover of the no—fly zone would occur in one or two days. They said NATO would have a final operational plan by over the weekend for how it would assume control over the rest of the protection mission, and that it would be executable by Tuesday’s meeting in London of nations contributing to the military action.

Ms. Clinton also praised the United Arab Emirates for becoming the second Arab country after Qatar to send planes to help the mission to protect Libyan civilians, enforce the U.N. arms embargo on the North African country and support humanitarian aid efforts. The U.A.E. will deploy 12 planes.

The Pentagon, meanwhile, indicated U.S. warplanes will keep flying strike missions over Libya. Navy Vice Adm. William Gortney, staff director for the military Joint Chiefs, told reporters that the American role will mainly be in support missions such as refuelling allied planes and providing aerial surveillance of Libya. But the U.S. will still fly combat missions as needed, Vice Adm. Gortney said.

“And I would anticipate that we would continue to provide some of the interdiction strike packages as well, should that be needed by the coalition,” he added, referring to combat missions such as attacks on Libyan mobile air defences, ammunition depots, air fields and other assets that support Libyan ground forces.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.