Libyan rebels forced to beat a retreat

March 31, 2011 03:19 am | Updated November 17, 2021 03:54 am IST - DUBAI:

Opposition forces reeling under heavy shelling from pro-Qadhafi forces have retreated from the oil town of Ras Lanuf, negating their earlier rapid advance towards regime strongholds to the West.

On Wednesday, government forces shelled the opposition militia with mortars and Russia-made Grad rockets. This accelerated the latter's retreat from Bin Jawad, and then from Ras Lanuf, an important oil town, home to a major refinery. The frontline in the Libyan conflict has now shifted 200 km further east of the regime stronghold of Sirte.

The opposition retreat has been dramatic, for on Monday anti-Qadhafi forces had advanced to the village of Nawfaliya, 20 km west of Bin Jawad, and were within striking distance of Sirte, home to Libyan strongman Muammar Qadhafi. But, faced with stiff resistance on their way to Sirte, the opposition was forced to retreat. The anti-Qadhafi forces had on Tuesday pulled back to Ras Lanuf. But pursued by the better armed regime fighters, they seemed to have entirely lost their hold over the town. The fall of Ras Lanuf has again exposed the defences of Ajdabiyah, which is only 160 km away from Benghazi, the opposition's de facto capital.

Al Jazeera is reporting that western forces appear to have launched air strikes between Ras Lanuf and Brega, the last major oil town, before Ajdabiyah can be approached. But so far, these strikes have been unable to retard the opposition's retreat.

Intensity of strikes

Anti-regime fighters are apprehensive about the intensity of air strikes, as on Wednesday, the NATO alliance has taken over the command and control of enforcing the no-fly zone, mandated by the United Nations to prevent attacks on civilians. Turkey, an important member of NATO, is apparently emphatic that the air strikes are ordered strictly in accordance with the U.N. mandate.

Regarding arming the rebels, there are two major concerns which are being aired pending a final decision. First, the transfer of weapons might entail posting American troops for the purpose of training. This could be interpreted as a violation the U.N. resolution, which stands opposed to the deployment of foreign ground forces in Libya.

Second, senior officials in the U.S. establishment are fearful that weapons may get transferred to Al-Qaeda elements which might have infiltrated the opposition ranks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.