Iran assails two-state solution for Palestinians

October 01, 2011 03:33 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:42 pm IST - TEHRAN

An Iranian clergyman holds a poster of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as he attends an annual nationwide pro-Palestinian rally known as Quds Day, in Tehran, on Aug. 26, 2011. Quds is the Arabic word for Jerusalem.

An Iranian clergyman holds a poster of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as he attends an annual nationwide pro-Palestinian rally known as Quds Day, in Tehran, on Aug. 26, 2011. Quds is the Arabic word for Jerusalem.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei assailed a two state solution for Israel and the Palestinians on Saturday, saying the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations is doomed to fail.

Mr. Khamenei said the Palestinians should not limit themselves to seeking a country based on the pre-1967 borders which would implicitly recognise Israel because “all land belongs to Palestinians.”

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has asked the U.N. Security Council to recognise an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip areas captured by Israel in the 1967 war.

Israel and the U.S. oppose the U.N. bid, saying there is no substitute for direct negotiations. But with Israel continuing to build settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, Mr. Abbas says there is no point in talking.

Iran doesn’t recognise Israel and considers it an archenemy.

Mr. Khamenei, who spoke at a pro-Palestinian conference in Tehran, once again called Israel a “cancerous tumour” that should be removed.

Iran supports the militant Palestinian Hamas group, which rules Gaza and which does not back the statehood bid pushed by Mr. Abbas and his Western-backed Fatah.

“Our claim is freedom of Palestine, not part of Palestine. Any plan that partitions Palestine is totally rejected,” Mr. Khamenei told the gathering. “Palestine spans from the river (Jordan) to the sea (Mediterranean), nothing less.”

Mr. Khamenei claimed that a two state solution would mean “giving in to the demand of the Zionists” and that it would “trample the rights of the Palestinian people” to live on their land.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.