Iran asks UN to revise resolution, warns of legal consequences

June 18, 2010 03:11 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:08 pm IST - Hamburg

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures while speaking during a public gathering in his provincial tour at the city of Shahr-e-Kord, 543 kilometers, south of Tehran on Wednesday. He says Tehran supports a dialogue with the outside world but that world powers must first be punished for the latest round of U.N. sanctions imposed on Iran. Photo: AP.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures while speaking during a public gathering in his provincial tour at the city of Shahr-e-Kord, 543 kilometers, south of Tehran on Wednesday. He says Tehran supports a dialogue with the outside world but that world powers must first be punished for the latest round of U.N. sanctions imposed on Iran. Photo: AP.

Iran urged the United Nations Security Council on Friday to revise its Resolution 1929, which slaps new sanctions on the Islamic republic and warned of legal consequences otherwise.

A statement by the country’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), which was carried by the official news agency IRNA, said the involvement of the Security Council in the Iranian nuclear issue was “illegal and therefore without any credit” and should therefore be immediately corrected and revised.

The UN Security Council voted last week in favour of a fourth sanctions resolution against Iran over its disputed nuclear activities, which the West fears are aimed towards a nuclear weapons capability.

The SNSC, the country’s highest decision—making body, warned that any move against the legal and legitimate rights of the Iranian nation would be decisively replied to by Iran through legal means.

The SNSC, led by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, did not say what this legal reply would be.

Uncle Sam deplored as resolution initiator

The statement also condemned the U.S. as the initiator of the resolution and said while Washington itself commissioned Brazil and Turkey to mediate in the nuclear dispute, the positive results of the mediation were then ignored by the U.S.

Iran, Brazil and Turkey reached an agreement last month in Tehran on swapping Iran’s uranium for enriched fuel for a medical reactor in Tehran. However, the West regards this agreement as insufficient, as it fails to stop Iran from enriching uranium to 20 per cent, an important technical step for weaponising uranium. The SNSC said that instead of issuing resolutions against a country which, in line with the Nuclear Non—Proliferation Treaty, just pursues peaceful nuclear technology, the U.S. should deal with the Israeli nuclear arsenal.

The statement added that a country which could not even control an oil spill like the one in the Gulf of Mexico, could not expose itself as protector of the Non—Proliferation Treaty and global peace.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.