"IPCC statement supported by peer-reviewed scientific evidence"

June 23, 2010 01:29 am | Updated November 17, 2021 05:53 am IST - London:

Britain's leading newspaper The Sunday Times has apologised to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change chairman R.K. Pachauri for an article it published in January asserting that the U.N. panel's Amazon statement was “bogus”.

The newspaper not only published a correction but also an apology, which is considered a “giant climb down.”

It said “the article, ‘U.N. climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim', stated that the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report had included an unsubstantiated claim that up to 40 per cent of the Amazon rainforest could be sensitive to future changes in rainfall.”

The IPCC had referenced the claim to a report prepared for WWF [World Wildlife Fund] by Andrew Rowell and Peter Moore, whom the article described as “green campaigners” with “little scientific expertise.”

The article also stated that the authors' research had been based on a scientific paper that dealt with the impact of human activity rather than climate change.

“In fact, the IPCC's Amazon statement is supported by peer-reviewed scientific evidence. In the case of the WWF report, the figure had, in error, not been references, but was based on research by the respected Amazon Environmental Research Institute [IPAM] which did relate to the impact of climate change,” the paper said in the correction.

“A version of our article that had been checked with [Prof. Simon] Lewis underwent significant late editing and so did not give a fair or accurate account of his views on these points. We apologise for this.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.