Indo-Pak ties: A troubled path to peace

Efforts to forge peace between India and Pakistan have always been disrupted by troubling developments. With Tuesday's talks failing to break the deadlock is a thaw possible?

April 27, 2016 05:16 pm | Updated July 15, 2020 01:52 pm IST

The foreign secretaries of India and Pakistan held bilateral talks on Tuesday, April 26, which touched upon a range of issues: the Pathankot terror attack probe, Jammu and Kashmir, and the Mumbai terror attacks. All eyes were set yesterday on the first formal meeting between the two top diplomats - Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar and his Pakistani counterpart Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry – which comes after talks between the two countries were postponed following the January 2 attack on the Pathankot airbase by Pakistani terrorists. But the meeting failed to break the deadlock, which followed Pakistan High Commissioner Abdul Basit’s comments earlier this month announcing that the bilateral peace process was suspended.

What did Tuesday’s talks achieve in helping to take forward the stalled Indo-Pak Comprehensive Bilateral Dialogue (CBD) that was agreed upon in December last year? Listen to our Diplomatic Affairs Editor Suhasini Haidar sum-up key takeaways from yesterday’s meetings:

Video editing: Charumathi Kalyanaraman; Cameraperson: Shanker Chakravarthy

Timeline: 1997-2016

In fact, this is not the first time that an effort at forging peace between the two countries have been disrupted by a troubling development, the latest instance being the Pathankot attack. In the timeline below, we trace the nearly two-decade-old effort at conducting composite dialogues between the two countries, disrupted by flare-ups such as war, terror attacks and ceasefire violations.

As Happymon Jacob, Associate Professor of Disarmament Studies at Jawaharlal Nehru University, pointed out, even a cursory glance at the Indo-Pak timeline shows how the bilateral relationship in the last two decades has been an unfortunate victim of mindless terrorist violence, lack of proper institutional mechanisms to manage the ceasefire, and the unwillingness of the political leaders to take bold steps in resolving their outstanding conflicts. He cites the “loss of nerve by the Manmohan Singh government to ink the Kashmir deal that was quietly negotiated by the backchannel negotiators between 2004 and 2007” as an example of "failed negotiations".

Our only hope now is to look forward to the 19th SAARC summit in September 2016, to see if efforts will be renewed in the run-up to the regional peace summit to improve ties between the two countries, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi is slated to visit Islamabad then.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.