SEARCH

News » International

Updated: April 24, 2010 02:13 IST

“India, Pakistan must resume talks”

Sandeep Dikshit
Comment (6)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
PTI

“Composite dialogue a very good initiative: Pakistan security sources

India and Pakistan must take reciprocal steps to lessen the threat of violence by non-state actors against each other, senior security sources told a group of visiting Indian journalists.

“We have to sit down and work it out both ways,” said the sources, wondering how “ragtag” groups on the border with Afghanistan came to acquire anti-tank mines and anti-aircraft guns.

“The leaders should resolve disputes by talking. Otherwise, a third party will always be there to take a piece of the cake. The best way is to talk to each other,” the sources said to a question on the security threat India was facing from Pakistan-based groups. In their first-ever interaction with a team of Indian journalists, the sources commended the now-suspended composite dialogue and said this “very good initiative” must be revived.

While the Pakistan security forces had militants in Punjab under surveillance and were taking action against them, their priority was stamping out militancy in the frontier regions and Balochistan, where there was credible evidence of the involvement of foreign intelligence agencies. “How do ragtag groups acquire the capability to create this kind of impact with the entire [Pakistani] military being engaged to overcome such groups,” they asked and suggested that India and Pakistan as well as other actors in the region interact to allay each other's apprehensions.

The sources declined to name the foreign intelligence agencies suspected to be involved in Balochistan and frontier areas, nor did they offer proof of their activities. “The work of intelligence is not to leave signatures, not to leave behind anything on the table. Not all the [militant] groups are indigenous. There are substantial arms, ammunition and money from other sources,” they said, while cautioning, “If you hit us, we will hit you hard and leave no signatures as well.”

Banning groups was no solution; that would only lead to the formation of splinter groups, the sources said. Though south Punjab in Pakistan, home to several anti-India militant groups, was densely populated, the state had access to all parts of the region and operations were constantly taking place. “Still a lot of efforts are on. The way Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan was organised, there is no huge organisation [here] which has a huge area to itself. Military is not required.”

Threat perception

The sources said: “Then, we have to see the capability of the group to threaten the state at that point of time. If you dissipate resources and a reverse happens, then there will be no last line of defence.”

“Because of overwhelming threat, Pakistan became a security state. The youth in Punjab have been brutalised. One group or the other can keep forming. We have to address the cause leading to the formation of such groups. The best way is to talk to each other.”

Admitting that there was a lot of criticism of the Pakistani Army being India-centric, the sources said this was based on threat perception. Pakistan had to configure deployment of armed forces towards India due to a history of conflict, unresolved political disputes and increasing offensive capability. “No state can be expected to lower defence in such an environment.”

Though the Indian Army's doctrine of Cold Start might or might not have been validated, Pakistan had to guard against such an eventuality in view of its increased offensive capabilities. The doctrine is the Indian Army's quest to reduce the time taken to reach the border. It was adopted after it took nearly three months to bring its men and equipment to the border with Pakistan during the December 2001 mobilisation.

Yes, I think India should resume dialogue with Pakistan because as India is always in favour of peace and there is no other way to maintain peace. By resuming talks with Pakistan we can pressurise them to stop terrorist activities.

from:  ravinder singh
Posted on: May 2, 2010 at 11:22 IST

Aha i see the saffron brigade has commented on this sensitive issue in typical military language. My theory is that there is no other option besides the two on the table- We should make peace with Pakistan or invade it. There is no third option. Its easy to say this and that. But the fact on the ground remains. We are culturally,militarily and economically superior to Pakistan. We don't need to waste our men and time on such puny threats. We need to finish this conflict and concentrate on our economy and of course China. Now China is one adversary that doesn't believe in compromise. Its the third largest nation and still it cries over a tiny arunachal pradesh. Take a step! invade or make peace. But dont sit on your couches and utter stupid ''diplomatic'' sentences .

from:  Zaid Khan
Posted on: Apr 26, 2010 at 22:58 IST

India is a South-Asian federation. Talks should be about a future India-Pakistan merger instead of petty differences of the past.

from:  Raj Rajaratnam
Posted on: Apr 26, 2010 at 20:26 IST

Fewer ugly incidents take place in India when India does not talk to Pakistan. So, not talking is better than talking.

Further, civil authority in Pakistan does not seem to be in control of Pakistant. Why talk to someone who does not have any capability to deliver.

from:  R Rai
Posted on: Apr 24, 2010 at 01:58 IST

Pakis now crying for talks when the monster created by them turns on it's creator itself. Even then they have the gall to blame India for the mess they created themselves.
Talks will never work with Pakistan. Pakistan as an entity is too unstable, wicked to trust. Pakistan has dishonoured every single treaty and agreement it has signed right from it's birth. They don't respect rights of POWs, attack India as soon as they could in 1947, 65. Killed 100000s of Balngladeshis and creeped up to Kargil in 1999.

from:  DVijay
Posted on: Apr 24, 2010 at 00:34 IST

This is the biggest garbage ,we keep lisining from pak. There should be no Composite dialogues with pask at any cost till all terror activities run by the Army are brought down

from:  Anand
Posted on: Apr 24, 2010 at 00:05 IST
Show all comments
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

National

Business

Cricket

Sport


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in International

Author P.D. James during an interview in New York, Nov. 27, 2005. File photo

Novelist P.D. James dies at 94

Publisher Faber and Faber says mystery writer P.D. James, who brought realistic modern characters to the classical British detective stor... »